From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753913AbbKBPeO (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2015 10:34:14 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.131]:50453 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751373AbbKBPeM (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2015 10:34:12 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Daniel Lezcano , tglx@linutronix.de, Heiko Stuebner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , john.stultz@linaro.org, Caesar Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/22] clocksource/drivers/rockchip: Make the driver more compatible Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 16:33:27 +0100 Message-ID: <5093304.EN6Bc2EjLr@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-10-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1446469011-22710-3-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> References: <1446469011-22710-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <1446469011-22710-3-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:hlVu2VGVSlf7WU9+YgwoPiKw3/gEY1ICTKqCFevEG7QvaBcCOc2 be0iQ9UQR9CvlGwDfr+B5O/B2lMMqORZkqIlZUOn1Gp/VXv4cjRmlFU8Wm5LGZFZD/Q790A BncMRVFzPF0wjvFA73AHKg8M+QrkLpMG6YLF/RWzoag6bwHxPB/BhTU6Yv4L8M0glUO3SkE Oo98jAgBw3/l7BsPM0sgw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:YoYRalT6D+c=:aogYtzu+iW6TCfePUKkjGU ngO6uCc8n4pNC4HG7hnSLoMQvFzEQ+oVews9axxZlHqLhT1Ian1Kf701ld7SseZr1HsyCpYAX CONxkJ5c5CTXMT3+sS10hwQhHwb4dxj5wUWcBkl/nz8MI+WdZQvqLTRPRYDfmWKYSabgUDGa5 jEfLdJ0LLXTDILs/GjLjJ5nYuLQkhvw3mW9oGSEOaCV7aGVjUElIuSz2GGqYJy9C71YRRa8Ac XNMV2mBai/K80GJYYE+1PIivK7mMvAo2Xl6OTld9MaaKQ4ejLJY+uYuPZ9oe63DzqZbq4Djp1 9Htc+l27XXQLIInldqbtd+/eCKeslcfWWvgXsVL0I3GUfb/0zXqn1JYA4cyGRrsTXCc3ACQaP Er144hR4O48vNAlimrIR0cDMaFe4NB16Ih9Go3Ua1POol1k+L2SET2uTa2jzIwftqnYezyxLi W/AV+mxUKCr7HUrrMQR+CYKQOaaqMBVAbLHxBX5BBgZVaa6GAYsPJHFYDwkpePwwsrRO5EEL7 5to8oARggyemRHJeXwczE9ZwCJR3g9YQ8DQFeXspeIe8o9cDLD5NRS1+oJ9Udyhq5Y/6X/xeP NxYX6cEszVjFaOjy5VaTOvsDC+bk261C0yNqsJ7Txd/IW6Kgf7aKX+Wj8g/7idw4e464giZIR HIvTo/Fs9z7C6yz1QN55KeZeL42fUb3UqrRVaRB9eqcq8+zZigsHIuF+8TyneitMetBJBfUo3 tV8VuzvrlfL/pnHO Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 02 November 2015 13:56:31 Daniel Lezcano wrote: > static inline void rk_timer_disable(struct clock_event_device *ce) > { > writel_relaxed(TIMER_DISABLE, rk_base(ce) + TIMER_CONTROL_REG); > - dsb(); > + dsb(sy); > } > > static inline void rk_timer_enable(struct clock_event_device *ce, u32 flags) > { > writel_relaxed(TIMER_ENABLE | TIMER_INT_UNMASK | flags, > rk_base(ce) + TIMER_CONTROL_REG); > - dsb(); > + dsb(sy); > } > > This will fail the compile test, because dsb() is not available on non-ARM architectures. Would it be enough to just use the normal writel() accessor here? Arnd