From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754654Ab2KHCcE (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2012 21:32:04 -0500 Received: from na3sys009aog134.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.83]:55573 "EHLO na3sys009aog134.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752549Ab2KHCcC (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2012 21:32:02 -0500 Message-ID: <509B19CC.9000707@marvell.com> Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 10:32:44 +0800 From: Qing Xu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Brown Cc: "lrg@ti.com" , "sameo@linux.intel.com" , "grant.likely@secretlab.ca" , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" , "haojian.zhuang@gmail.com" , Chao Xie , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] mfd: max8925: support dt for regulator References: <1352282993-26449-1-git-send-email-qingx@marvell.com> <20121107142007.GB20844@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> In-Reply-To: <20121107142007.GB20844@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Nov 2012 02:31:52.0166 (UTC) FILETIME=[3623B060:01CDBD59] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/07/2012 10:20 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 06:09:53PM +0800, Qing Xu wrote: >> From: Qing Xu >> >> Signed-off-by: Qing Xu > Applied, thanks. > >> +max8925 regulator device register is still handled by mfd_add_devices, not by >> +of_xxx, so, it is not necessary to add compatible name. Also, those reg >> +offset and id info is stored in mfd_cell(see max8925-core.c), as a result >> +there is not private properties in dts. >> +node's name should match with the definition in max8925_regulator_matches >> +(see max8925-regulator.c) > Please submit a followup which removes all the Linux-specific references > and just enumerates the supported regulators. Please do also use a > subject line appropriate for the subsystem - this is for the regulator > driver so it should be regulator: updated in another patch, please help me review it, thanks.