From: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paweł Sikora" <pawel.sikora@agmk.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, arekm@pld-linux.org,
baggins@pld-linux.org
Subject: Re: [3.6.6] panic on reboot / khungtaskd blocked? (WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:123 native_smp_send_reschedule)
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 11:08:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A30B35.8070908@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50A306AA.9000308@gmail.com>
On 11/14/2012 10:49 AM, Robert Hancock wrote:
> On 11/13/2012 08:32 PM, Michael Wang wrote:
>> On 11/13/2012 05:40 PM, Paweł Sikora wrote:
>>> On Monday 12 of November 2012 13:33:39 Paweł Sikora wrote:
>>>> On Monday 12 of November 2012 11:22:47 Paweł Sikora wrote:
>>>>> On Monday 12 of November 2012 15:40:31 Michael Wang wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/12/2012 03:16 PM, Paweł Sikora wrote:
>>>>>>> On Monday 12 of November 2012 11:04:12 Michael Wang wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 11/09/2012 09:48 PM, Paweł Sikora wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> during playing with new ups i've caught an nice oops on reboot:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://imgbin.org/index.php?page=image&id=10253
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> probably the upstream is also affected.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi, Paweł
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you using a clean 3.6.6 without any modify?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> yes, pure 3.6.6 form git tree with modular config.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Looks like some threads has set itself to be UNINTERRUPTIBLE
>>>>>>>> with out
>>>>>>>> any design on switch itself back later(or the time is too long),
>>>>>>>> are you
>>>>>>>> accidentally using some bad designed module?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> hmm, hard to say. mostly all modules are loaded automatically by
>>>>>>> kernel.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could you please provide the whole dmesg in text? your picture
>>>>>> lost the
>>>>>> print info of the hung task.
>>>>>
>>>>> i've grabbed the console via rs232 but there's no more info (see
>>>>> attached txt).
>>>>
>>>> hmm, i have one observation.
>>>>
>>>> during rc.shutdown there're messages on console like this: Cannot
>>>> stat file /proc/$pid/fd/1: Connection timed out
>>>> afaics this file descriptor points to vnc log file on a remote
>>>> machine, e.g.:
>>>>
>>>> # ps aux|grep xfwm4
>>>> eda 1748 0.0 0.0 320220 11224 ? S 13:08 0:00 xfwm4
>>>>
>>>> # readlink -m /proc/1748/fd/1
>>>> /remote/dragon/ahome/eda/.vnc/odra:11.log
>>>>
>>>> # mount|grep ahome
>>>> dragon:/home/users/ on /remote/dragon/ahome type nfs
>>>> (rw,relatime,vers=3,rsize=262144,wsize=262144,namlen=255,soft,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=10.0.2.121,mountvers=3,mountport=45251,mountproto=udp,local_lock=none,addr=10.0.2.121)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> so, probably during `killall5 -TERM/-KILL` on shutdown stage
>>>> something sometimes go wrong
>>>> and these processes (xfce4/vncserver) survive the signal and hang on
>>>> the nfs i/o.
>>>>
>>>
>>> ok, now i have full sysrq+w backtraces from shutdown process. i hope
>>> i'll help you.
>>
>> This can only tell us what's the task in UNINTERRUPTABLE state, but with
>> out time info, we can't find out which one is the hung task...
>
> Probably all of the ones in D state waiting on NFS are the issue - but
> as I understand it, with modern kernels processes are supposed to be
> killable while waiting on NFS I/O. Maybe there's a bug that affects
> this, though?
That sounds possible, I thing Paweł can try to stop using NFS(if
possible) and take a look, if the issue disappear, then it's time to
report the bug to NFS folks.
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-14 3:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-09 13:48 Paweł Sikora
2012-11-12 3:04 ` Michael Wang
2012-11-12 7:16 ` Paweł Sikora
2012-11-12 7:40 ` Michael Wang
2012-11-12 10:22 ` Paweł Sikora
2012-11-12 12:33 ` Paweł Sikora
2012-11-13 2:51 ` Michael Wang
2012-11-13 9:40 ` Paweł Sikora
2012-11-14 2:32 ` Michael Wang
2012-11-14 2:49 ` Robert Hancock
2012-11-14 3:08 ` Michael Wang [this message]
2012-11-14 21:10 ` Paweł Sikora
2012-11-15 1:41 ` Michael Wang
2012-11-15 9:40 ` Jan Kara
2012-11-16 2:50 ` Michael Wang
2012-11-16 3:11 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50A30B35.8070908@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=arekm@pld-linux.org \
--cc=baggins@pld-linux.org \
--cc=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pawel.sikora@agmk.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome