mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, penberg@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, smpboot: allow manual hotplug of CPUs
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:35:50 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50AD2D16.7050304@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50AD2A85.7030705@zytor.com>

On 11/21/2012 02:24 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 11/21/2012 11:19 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>>
>>> So, are there any mptables platforms which support hotplug?  If the
>>> answer is "KVM" then the answer is that KVM needs to move to ACPI to get
>>> the proper functionality; putting a hack in is really not okay.
>>
>> There are no platforms which support actual hotplug, but you can still set
>> existing processors as disabled in the table and without this patch there's
>> no way enable them.
>>
>> I'm not sure if it's a "hack" though - the presentation of hotpluggable cpus
>> is the almost the same between mptable and acpi, and acpi provides a way to
>> manually probe/release cpus as well. The only difference is that acpi also
>> provides notifications about such events.
>>
>> Actually, maybe acpi should start using probe/release as well... hmm...
>>
> 
> The bottom line is that I don't want the underlying implementation to
> end up with a user-visible difference... therein lies madness and lots
> of bugs.

Okay, so if in the case of ACPI, 'probe' will call acpi_processor_add()
and 'release' would call acpi_processor_remove() so the behaviour
would be the same for both ACPI and mptables. Is this okay?


Thanks,
Sasha

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-21 19:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-21 18:22 Sasha Levin
2012-11-21 18:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-11-21 18:35   ` Sasha Levin
2012-11-21 18:38     ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-11-21 19:19       ` Sasha Levin
2012-11-21 19:24         ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-11-21 19:35           ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2012-11-21 19:39             ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50AD2D16.7050304@oracle.com \
    --to=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®