From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] fs: configfs: programmatically create config groups
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:06:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B3A1A0.2000607@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xa1ty5hogv6j.fsf@mina86.com>
On 11/26/2012 05:56 PM, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
>> On 11/26/2012 09:35 AM, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
>>> In some parts of the kernel (e.g. planned configfs integration into usb
>>> gadget) there is a need to programmatically create config groups
>>> (directories) but it would be preferable to disallow creating them by
>>> the user. This is more or less what default_groups used to be for.
>>> But e.g. in the mass storage gadget, after storing the number of
>>> luns (logical units) into some configfs attribute, the corresponding lun#
>>> directories should be created, their number is not known up front so
>>> default_groups are no good for this.
>>>
>>> Example:
>>>
>>> $ echo 3> /cfg/..../mass_storage/luns
>>>
>>> causes
>>>
>>> /cfg/....../mass_storage/lun0
>>> /cfg/....../mass_storage/lun1
>>> /cfg/....../mass_storage/lun2
>
> On Mon, Nov 26 2012, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> I though we did not want the luns file but instead use
>>
>> mkdir /cfg/....../mass_storage/lun0
>> mkdir /cfg/....../mass_storage/lun1
>>
>> directly.
>
> I think that's suboptimal, and we can do better. There are too many
> corner cases (ie. what if user does “mkdir lun7” without the previous
> luns?), it adds complexity to the kernel (ie. parsing of the name), and
> the thing is overly complicated for user (“echo 5> nluns” is much nicer
> than having to create 5 directories).
Wouldn't say that. It may adds complexity on another level. The target
subsystem has the same problem with adding luns and there seems nothing
wrong with having lun3 and 4 and leaving 0 and 1 unsued.
With the tcm gadget I get:
|scsi 0:0:0:2: Direct-Access LIO-ORG RAMDISK-MCP 4.0 PQ: 0
ANSI: 5
|scsi 0:0:0:3: Direct-Access LIO-ORG FILEIO 4.0 PQ: 0
ANSI: 5
You notice :2 and :3 instead :0 and :1. While should be there something
wrong with this?
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-26 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-26 8:35 Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
2012-11-26 8:35 ` [RFC][PATCH] fs: configfs: allow other kernel parts to " Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
2012-11-26 13:14 ` [RFC][PATCH] fs: configfs: " Michal Nazarewicz
2012-11-26 16:30 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-11-26 16:56 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2012-11-26 17:06 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2012-11-26 17:54 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2012-11-27 15:20 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-11-28 7:08 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-11-27 8:57 ` Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
2012-11-27 14:32 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2012-11-27 15:59 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-11-27 16:23 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2012-11-28 8:15 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-11-28 13:05 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2012-11-28 13:50 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-11-28 14:24 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2012-11-28 18:52 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-12-07 23:18 ` Joel Becker
2012-12-10 11:57 ` Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
2012-12-10 14:17 ` Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
2012-12-10 14:34 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-12-10 15:27 ` Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
2012-12-12 1:10 ` Joel Becker
2012-12-11 21:27 ` Joel Becker
2012-12-14 12:18 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-11-28 8:10 ` Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
2012-11-28 8:38 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-11-28 14:09 ` Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50B3A1A0.2000607@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=andrzej.p@samsung.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mina86@mina86.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome