From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755163Ab2LGCOb (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2012 21:14:31 -0500 Received: from intranet.asianux.com ([58.214.24.6]:64279 "EHLO intranet.asianux.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754671Ab2LGCOa (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2012 21:14:30 -0500 X-Spam-Score: -100.8 Message-ID: <50C1513A.4010600@asianux.com> Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:15:22 +0800 From: Chen Gang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120911 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Fulghum CC: Greg KH , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH] synclink fix ldisc buffer argument References: <50B6E751.9000000@asianux.com> <20121129051335.GA4375@kroah.com> <50B6F967.3050000@asianux.com> <20121129183207.GA4688@kroah.com> <50B81F76.8020508@asianux.com> <50B8DDAC.8070901@microgate.com> <50B90D0D.9040401@microgate.com> <50BCDDB4.6010608@microgate.com> In-Reply-To: <50BCDDB4.6010608@microgate.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Greg Kroah-Hartman: 于 2012年12月04日 01:13, Paul Fulghum 写道: > Fix call to line discipline receive_buf by synclink drivers. > Dummy flag buffer argument is ignored by N_HDLC line discipline but might > be of insufficient size if accessed by a different line discipline > selected by mistake. flag buffer allocation now matches max size of data > buffer. Unused char_buf buffers are removed. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Fulghum if no additional questions: is it suitable to let this patch pass checking ? at least for me, it is surely solve an issue, and no negative effect. now, maybe Paul Fulghum is busy... the left questions what I have sent seems minor. so they can be delayed, until he has free time. when Paul Fulghum has free time. can still check what my left questions whether valid. if they are valid, can send additional patch for them. is it OK ? Regards -- Chen Gang Asianux Corporation