From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: local timers vs APIC question
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:33:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C1D423.6000400@free.fr> (raw)
Hi All,
I have a question about the timers on the intel platform.
While looking at the /proc/interrupts on different hosts, I see for an
intel i7 or intel Xeon 5345, the IO-APIC-edge timer is rarely used and
the local timers are widely used but on Core 2 Duo T9500, the APIC timer
is more used than the local timers.
Why there is such difference ? Does anyone have a hint to investigate
why that happens ?
Thanks in advance
-- Daniel
reply other threads:[~2012-12-07 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50C1D423.6000400@free.fr \
--to=daniel.lezcano@free.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome