mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] avoid entropy starvation due to stack protection
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 08:44:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C98764.6050104@chronox.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121212164321.a01c5641.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On 13.12.2012 01:43:21, +0100, Andrew Morton
<akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

Hi Andrew,
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:33:04 +0100
> Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de> wrote:
>
>> Some time ago, I noticed the fact that for every newly
>> executed process, the function create_elf_tables requests 16 bytes of
>> randomness from get_random_bytes. This is easily visible when calling
>>
>> while [ 1 ]
>> do
>> 	cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail
>> 	sleep 1
>> done
> Please see
> http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/binfmt_elfc-use-get_random_int-to-fix-entropy-depleting.patch
>
> That patch is about one week from a mainline merge, btw.

Initially I was also thinking about get_random_int. But stack protection
depends on non-predictable numbers to ensure it cannot be defeated. As
get_random_int depends on MD5 which is assumed to be broken now, I
discarded the idea of using get_random_int.

Moreover, please consider that get_cycles is an architecture-specific
function that on some architectures only returns 0 (For all
architectures where this is implemented, you have no guarantee that it
increments as a high-resolution timer). So, the quality of
get_random_int is questionable IMHO for the use as a stack protector.

Also note, that other in-kernel users of get_random_bytes may be
converted to using the proposed kernel pool to avoid more entropy drainage.

Please note that the suggested approach of fully seeding a deterministic
RNG never followed by a re-seeding is used elsewhere (e.g. the OpenSSL
RNG). Therefore, I think the suggested approach is viable.

Ciao
Stephan


  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-13  7:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-11 12:33 Stephan Mueller
2012-12-12 10:48 ` Stephan Mueller
2012-12-13  0:43 ` Andrew Morton
2012-12-13  7:44   ` Stephan Mueller [this message]
2012-12-14 17:36     ` Stephan Mueller
2012-12-16  0:30       ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-12-16 12:46         ` Stephan Müller
2012-12-21 20:07         ` Ondřej Bílka
2012-12-22 19:29           ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-12-15 19:15     ` Ondřej Bílka
2012-12-15 22:59       ` Stephan Müller
2012-12-21 19:32         ` Ondřej Bílka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50C98764.6050104@chronox.de \
    --to=smueller@chronox.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jeff.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome