From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753573Ab2LZDWF (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Dec 2012 22:22:05 -0500 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:20988 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753049Ab2LZDWB convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Dec 2012 22:22:01 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,355,1355068800"; d="scan'208";a="6474517" Message-ID: <50DA6D1E.1010209@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:21:02 +0800 From: Tang Chen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jianguo Wu CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, rientjes@google.com, liuj97@gmail.com, len.brown@intel.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, cl@linux.com, minchan.kim@gmail.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com, hpa@zytor.com, linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, mgorman@suse.de, yinghai@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, cmetcalf@tilera.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/14] memory-hotplug: implement register_page_bootmem_info_section of sparse-vmemmap References: <1356350964-13437-1-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> <1356350964-13437-7-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> <50D95F51.9090007@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <50D95F51.9090007@huawei.com> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on mailserver/fnst(Release 8.5.3|September 15, 2011) at 2012/12/26 11:21:47, Serialize by Router on mailserver/fnst(Release 8.5.3|September 15, 2011) at 2012/12/26 11:21:48 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/25/2012 04:09 PM, Jianguo Wu wrote: >> + >> + if (!cpu_has_pse) { >> + next = (addr + PAGE_SIZE)& PAGE_MASK; >> + pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr); >> + if (pmd_none(*pmd)) >> + continue; >> + get_page_bootmem(section_nr, pmd_page(*pmd), >> + MIX_SECTION_INFO); >> + >> + pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, addr); >> + if (pte_none(*pte)) >> + continue; >> + get_page_bootmem(section_nr, pte_page(*pte), >> + SECTION_INFO); >> + } else { >> + next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end); >> + >> + pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr); >> + if (pmd_none(*pmd)) >> + continue; >> + get_page_bootmem(section_nr, pmd_page(*pmd), >> + SECTION_INFO); > > Hi Tang, > In this case, pmd maps 512 pages, but you only get_page_bootmem() on the first page. > I think the whole 512 pages should be get_page_bootmem(), what do you think? > Hi Wu, Yes, thanks. I will fix it. :) Thanks. :)