From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753087Ab3ACJfE (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jan 2013 04:35:04 -0500 Received: from nat28.tlf.novell.com ([130.57.49.28]:59103 "EHLO nat28.tlf.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751134Ab3ACJe7 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jan 2013 04:34:59 -0500 Message-Id: <50E55ECF02000078000B2A13@nat28.tlf.novell.com> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 12.0.1 Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:34:55 +0000 From: "Jan Beulich" To: "Daniel Kiper" Cc: , , , , , "xen-devel" , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/11] x86/kexec: Add extra pointers to transition page table PGD, PUD, PMD and PTE References: <1356574740-6806-1-git-send-email-daniel.kiper@oracle.com> <1356574740-6806-2-git-send-email-daniel.kiper@oracle.com> <1356574740-6806-3-git-send-email-daniel.kiper@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <1356574740-6806-3-git-send-email-daniel.kiper@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>> On 27.12.12 at 03:18, Daniel Kiper wrote: > Some implementations (e.g. Xen PVOPS) could not use part of identity page > table > to construct transition page table. It means that they require separate > PUDs, > PMDs and PTEs for virtual and physical (identity) mapping. To satisfy that > requirement add extra pointer to PGD, PUD, PMD and PTE and align existing > code. So you keep posting this despite it having got pointed out on each earlier submission that this is unnecessary, proven by the fact that the non-pvops Xen kernels can get away without it. Why? Jan