From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758597AbdEVK1s (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2017 06:27:48 -0400 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:41796 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750928AbdEVK1p (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2017 06:27:45 -0400 Subject: Re: [linux-next / tty] possible circular locking dependency detected To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Jiri Slaby , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sergey Senozhatsky References: <20170522073943.GA469@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> <20170522102454.GA30331@kroah.com> From: Vegard Nossum Message-ID: <50cc6717-c709-873c-b434-07da13365977@oracle.com> Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 12:27:31 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170522102454.GA30331@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/22/17 12:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 04:39:43PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: >> Hello, >> >> [ 1274.378287] ====================================================== >> [ 1274.378289] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected >> [ 1274.378290] 4.12.0-rc1-next-20170522-dbg-00007-gc09b2ab28b74-dirty #1317 Not tainted >> [ 1274.378291] ------------------------------------------------------ >> [ 1274.378293] kworker/u8:5/111 is trying to acquire lock: >> [ 1274.378294] (&buf->lock){+.+...}, at: [] tty_buffer_flush+0x34/0x88 >> [ 1274.378300] >> but task is already holding lock: >> [ 1274.378301] (&o_tty->termios_rwsem/1){++++..}, at: [] isig+0x47/0xd2 >> [ 1274.378307] >> which lock already depends on the new lock. >> > Any hint as to what you were doing when this happened? > > Does this also show up in 4.11? It's my patch "tty: fix port buffer locking" :-/ At a glance, looks related to pty taking the lock on the other side in a different order. I'll have a closer look. Vegard