From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S933707AbcFQPBY (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:01:24 -0400
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.133]:52032 "EHLO
	mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S933676AbcFQPBW (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:01:22 -0400
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@dev.mellanox.co.il>
Cc: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
        Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>, Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
        Eli Cohen <eli@mellanox.com>, Majd Dibbiny <majd@mellanox.com>,
        Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mlx5: only register devlink when ethernet is available
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 17:02:33 +0200
Message-ID: <51058521.f6SstSCt2o@wuerfel>
User-Agent: KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-22-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CALzJLG8BEivMg4h+=FcQ_7QFrZTRhRNsPgEH68WPKfmkguvNqA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160615152816.2800830-1-arnd@arndb.de> <6330398.ySWGKSmLdn@wuerfel> <CALzJLG8BEivMg4h+=FcQ_7QFrZTRhRNsPgEH68WPKfmkguvNqA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Yrlhz9wsiDkFxnvPDyG36+/bXRkUn58S9JNAN7qLqI6iNMwiTfu
 hhOiEtlIQh1DrUVcj5c8X7/bwByHjh8/gnR0ES4JDpf2cKYZoScXFv2z6dVUBv0t2UWpuKi
 /luYybiq1xta60SrBExPlNWPyW76+BZ5ZYGkMosHgO38W18elvbcdzJt+3LQso8yXRM9yVi
 sjOYt9sKo4oJLbDkO0xKw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:RH7VOncKlKI=:iAeY5/8uDEHf6voWmcGQqk
 EKc6MMtZ6O7oZJkuX4JJNIm5LvuWCCZWM4xk14ppfhy++yi0RlTDMnjGo2Zpmu0cafjMUD6Gc
 wKwQjPip/TXJh1uDevmHawWi1o701J/4ol2ZKpF76YKkV2JJTagMpLBiYEF9G8SDKXfKrHeNv
 lLRTjxsE8AyI1Qp+wp5SKbpcShG+OkRrtcWl6aJ6TuzlCJWK20djy3fIGvkzCQcCSSKI/W66Q
 tn3LUroEUKgTYfF/JtQHEqnHNba0PHYBKTPxVP5oeiZ2ZKeqFuy/LhBj0v/SM4RrgX8dW7dVw
 XPvHbPcoylOkJ6Hi0WTnaWiU7Ut4izOaOnSwwZ1SErHQ1m9REABF+/0fYmP6OhsNef27VZVLh
 NNjV150gmVRXiBEIDq4XzJXUN4QS3J6E8pD3Kzb0pUqIv5z0N71rZgH9H/I8U4RWSZ8wbkmNB
 dVllCFhMl67/iQpPC9Go5Y5+3e2HEQ91YK4HkHTC341BSHiDem4w+8Z53gyyuQJkCdX2qZlS2
 EfO/UKnYoSGLEX6kSBB+feITXqQBWeIiO85q8S9X3hGr2K4za8kNLXcRjuD4VmDtRVQR0jaBq
 eRgXB31Rwq1UiG79PjboX6FZDtZ2V6RHYf2xMmkQFjG/2BPMhsSOnE8QYxdGySPeAIDqyHxD9
 qjcl7EJpQ4WWtmMlw42CYuZmVYwJDZmqEYOC1SkgE92lTd4bEkf1ACITL9wQ2ITb16Eh90I/1
 7mdJ8O5TdOc/mbDF
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Friday, June 17, 2016 5:50:14 PM CEST Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 7:04:54 PM CEST Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > Ok, I see. It would be nice if the process had a way to avoid build regressions
> > in linux-next, in particular if you already have a fix by the time a patch
> > that introduces a problem gets added.
> >
> 
> The reason we added this tree is to get 0-day testing but currently it
> makes some unwanted noise
> so we will remove it until we figure it out.

I think you can simply ask Fengguang Wu to add your git tree to the list
of trees he pulls from for the 0-day test bot.

> > Can you check if the fix for the second problem correctly removes the
> > unnecessary 64-bit division (as opposed to adding a call to div_s64()
> > or do_div()), and if it removes all traces of 'struct timespec' again?
> >
> 
> Yes, same thing, already fixed, will reply to that thread.

Ok, thanks for the confirmation!

	Arnd