From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E2E64644E for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 15:24:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711121071; cv=none; b=pgZBreQuEN7Wlh6pycceKMjdsBStErMqHHATAWyS8wewjqD7LlIWf1FWaMMgWozY+rd7096vjf3s0mmHguDnMRKzU1PHIKxhEmG/7iO0wL+bP0NLLKW+gTrhd0NDUffXJEO/GuBEKX3ynUuNvg13bmpdJJipZHVjeUi85jbOV7g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711121071; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4bc612VXAc2AsZ+PgolgNOWHPmU2xA/cgSPzznX2uM4=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=kitHjcLfSUwDD4N6zpvXfH7Y2GS0LQTIYB9utrCNFIsEJ2xfKC00r6AC++NSyHq/Ufl59FUOWkYGb9a6mIcjzjGQY5W2/omZ+wRkczAOpT8Kv7Ny2i857oloDIofMhBb/33qHGWMVmM/3Hjw7m3lvBgFrcMLqo8bP8QEYw0NkEs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=K44jhEqd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="K44jhEqd" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 84319C433F1; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 15:24:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1711121071; bh=4bc612VXAc2AsZ+PgolgNOWHPmU2xA/cgSPzznX2uM4=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=K44jhEqd8bJ9sYinHvEMd/RC1QM0zVPGp01f/wHFtqkbTX+ehXRjV16i6Ej+xoFRG HAWrbE7Oa9wMv/Wzz19tVUYe01xIMDXTAq/424Vcvzci6Bu5f3EBbdHftwZEe0ajCK Y13k1gpjHWPxQ3PEGBTI/3sBSnPq7P30l/H2Xp1ZSyU60TokSuBFJ8ueWklkcp6j9C L/Oclp1UxDkYc98ELPeO582Sf3EQ/BEqrWL5K08uLJo4Up5/fYjfI5wvBJeS0m7k0V mpZPfKaWsw1T98xname32MagwKBYxh6jxECDgh/YqqcSc/qxN4QnGJMAzi5neOo5fA 2HPns8vMNH/RQ== Message-ID: <510c1b6b-1738-4baa-bdba-54d478633598@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 09:24:29 -0600 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/5] mlx5 ConnectX control misc driver Content-Language: en-US To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Jason Gunthorpe , Christoph Hellwig , Saeed Mahameed , Arnd Bergmann , Leon Romanovsky , Jiri Pirko , Leonid Bloch , Itay Avraham , Jakub Kicinski , Saeed Mahameed , Aron Silverton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Gospodarek References: <20240207072435.14182-1-saeed@kernel.org> <20240214175735.GG1088888@nvidia.com> <20240304160237.GA2909161@nvidia.com> <9cc7127f-8674-43bc-b4d7-b1c4c2d96fed@kernel.org> <2024032248-ardently-ribcage-a495@gregkh> From: David Ahern In-Reply-To: <2024032248-ardently-ribcage-a495@gregkh> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 3/22/24 1:32 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > It's the middle of the merge window, not much we can actually do and > this patch series itself couldn't be applied as-is, so it's hard to see > what could have happened on my end... > The proposal was sent a week before the end of the last development cycle, and I believe the intent was to motivate discussion around a concrete proposal to converge on an acceptable solution before sending patches. On your end, what would be helpful is either a simple yes this seems reasonable or no you don't like it for reasons X, Y, and Z.