mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
To: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] mfd: twl-core: Collect global variables behind one private structure (global)
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 06:50:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5115E3B9.6090100@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51154A7A.2010709@ti.com>

On 02/08/2013 07:56 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>  /**
>>   * twl_i2c_write - Writes a n bit register in TWL4030/TWL5030/TWL60X0
>>   * @mod_no: module number
>> @@ -322,16 +323,17 @@ int twl_i2c_write(u8 mod_no, u8 *value, u8 reg, unsigned num_bytes)
>>  		pr_err("%s: invalid module number %d\n", DRIVER_NAME, mod_no);
>>  		return -EPERM;
>>  	}
>> -	if (unlikely(!inuse)) {
>> +	if (unlikely(!twl_priv->ready)) {
> 
> This is causing the kernel to panic on all my omap2 boards when booting linux-next
> because twl_priv is not initialised yet.

Good catch.
I just wonder from where the twl_* call is coming on OMAP2. AFAIK the twl code
is for OMAP3/4, for OMAP2 Menelaus is the one which is used.
I'm currently working on to remove all those twl_* calls from random places in
the kernel so we will only access twl via the MFD stack.

> 
>>  		pr_err("%s: not initialized\n", DRIVER_NAME);
>>  		return -EPERM;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	sid = twl_map[mod_no].sid;
>> -	twl = &twl_modules[sid];
>> +	sid = twl_priv->twl_map[mod_no].sid;
>> +	twl = &twl_priv->twl_modules[sid];
>>  
>> -	ret = regmap_bulk_write(twl->regmap, twl_map[mod_no].base + reg,
>> -				value, num_bytes);
>> +	ret = regmap_bulk_write(twl->regmap,
>> +				twl_priv->twl_map[mod_no].base + reg, value,
>> +				num_bytes);
>>  
>>  	if (ret)
>>  		pr_err("%s: Write failed (mod %d, reg 0x%02x count %d)\n",
>> @@ -360,16 +362,17 @@ int twl_i2c_read(u8 mod_no, u8 *value, u8 reg, unsigned num_bytes)
>>  		pr_err("%s: invalid module number %d\n", DRIVER_NAME, mod_no);
>>  		return -EPERM;
>>  	}
>> -	if (unlikely(!inuse)) {
>> +	if (unlikely(!twl_priv->ready)) {
> 
> Same problem here. 
> 
> Here is a fix ...
> 
> From 141fcbbdee6bdc14d5a444ff20fad6b3440215dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:42:20 -0600
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Fix kernel panic on boot
> 
> Commit 8a6aaa3 (mfd: twl-core: Collect global variables behind one
> private structure (global)) removed the variable "inuse" that is used
> to determine if the device has been initialised and now use the
> twl_priv structure instead. This is causing the kernel to panic on all
> OMAP2+ devices, because we try to access the twl_priv->ready member
> before checking if twl_priv is initialised. Fix this and move this test
> to the beginning of the twl_i2c_read/write function because
> twl_get_last_module() also uses the twl_priv structure.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>

Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>

> ---
>  drivers/mfd/twl-core.c |   16 ++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c b/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
> index 557f9ee..89ab4d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
> @@ -316,12 +316,12 @@ int twl_i2c_write(u8 mod_no, u8 *value, u8 reg, unsigned num_bytes)
>  	int sid;
>  	struct twl_client *twl;
>  
> -	if (unlikely(mod_no >= twl_get_last_module())) {
> -		pr_err("%s: invalid module number %d\n", DRIVER_NAME, mod_no);
> +	if (unlikely(!twl_priv || !twl_priv->ready)) {
> +		pr_err("%s: not initialized\n", DRIVER_NAME);
>  		return -EPERM;
>  	}
> -	if (unlikely(!twl_priv->ready)) {
> -		pr_err("%s: not initialized\n", DRIVER_NAME);
> +	if (unlikely(mod_no >= twl_get_last_module())) {
> +		pr_err("%s: invalid module number %d\n", DRIVER_NAME, mod_no);
>  		return -EPERM;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -355,12 +355,12 @@ int twl_i2c_read(u8 mod_no, u8 *value, u8 reg, unsigned num_bytes)
>  	int sid;
>  	struct twl_client *twl;
>  
> -	if (unlikely(mod_no >= twl_get_last_module())) {
> -		pr_err("%s: invalid module number %d\n", DRIVER_NAME, mod_no);
> +	if (unlikely(!twl_priv || !twl_priv->ready)) {
> +		pr_err("%s: not initialized\n", DRIVER_NAME);
>  		return -EPERM;
>  	}
> -	if (unlikely(!twl_priv->ready)) {
> -		pr_err("%s: not initialized\n", DRIVER_NAME);
> +	if (unlikely(mod_no >= twl_get_last_module())) {
> +		pr_err("%s: invalid module number %d\n", DRIVER_NAME, mod_no);
>  		return -EPERM;
>  	}
>  
> 


-- 
Péter

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-09  5:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-16 13:53 [PATCH v2 00/11] MFD: twl-core: Cleanup part 2 for 3.9 Peter Ujfalusi
2013-01-16 13:53 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] ARM: OMAP: zoom-display: Remove the use of TWL4030_MODULE_PWM1 Peter Ujfalusi
2013-01-16 13:53 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] mfd: twl-core: Clean up module id lookup and definitions Peter Ujfalusi
2013-01-16 13:53 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] mfd: twl-core: No need to check for invalid subchip ID Peter Ujfalusi
2013-01-16 13:53 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] mfd: twl-core: Use the lookup table to find the correct subchip for the modules Peter Ujfalusi
2013-01-16 13:53 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] mfd: twl-core: Allocate twl_modules dynamically Peter Ujfalusi
2013-01-16 13:53 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] mfd: twl-core: Do not try to call legacy mfd add_children() when booted with DT Peter Ujfalusi
2013-01-16 13:53 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] mfd: twl-core: Do not create dummy pdata " Peter Ujfalusi
2013-01-16 13:53 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] mfd: twl-core: Move 'inuse' check early at probe time Peter Ujfalusi
2013-01-16 13:53 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] mfd: twl-core: Collect global variables behind one private structure (global) Peter Ujfalusi
2013-02-08 18:56   ` Jon Hunter
2013-02-09  5:50     ` Peter Ujfalusi [this message]
2013-02-11 20:22       ` Jon Hunter
2013-02-12  7:26         ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-02-12 16:15           ` Jon Hunter
2013-02-13 13:59             ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-01-16 13:53 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] mfd: twl-core: Remove no longer valid comment regarding to write buffer size Peter Ujfalusi
2013-01-16 13:53 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] mfd: twl-core: Move twl_i2c_read/write_u8 to header as inline function Peter Ujfalusi
2013-02-03 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] MFD: twl-core: Cleanup part 2 for 3.9 Samuel Ortiz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5115E3B9.6090100@ti.com \
    --to=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
    --cc=jon-hunter@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome