From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932833Ab3BLAI4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 19:08:56 -0500 Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([70.85.31.133]:40489 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760679Ab3BLAIr (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 19:08:47 -0500 Message-ID: <5119880C.8010602@wwwdotorg.org> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 17:08:44 -0700 From: Stephen Warren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Perches CC: arm@kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Julian Andres Klode , Marc Dietrich , Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] get_maintainer: allow keywords to match filenames References: <1360626016-23332-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <1360627226.4707.6.camel@joe-AO722> In-Reply-To: <1360627226.4707.6.camel@joe-AO722> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/11/2013 05:00 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 16:40 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: >> From: Stephen Warren >> >> Allow K: entries in MAINTAINERS to match directly against filenames; >> either those extracted from patch +++ or --- lines, or those specified >> on the command-line using the -f option. > [] >> I don't think setting exact_pattern_match_hash would be appropriate here; >> at least for intended Tegra use case, this feature is to ensure that all >> Tegra-related driver changes get Cc'd to the Tegra mailing list. Setting >> exact_pattern_match_hash would prevent git history parsing for e.g. S-o-b >> tags, which still seems like it would be useful. Hence, this flag isn't >> set. > > And I don't think that's necessary because for filenames, > you could add the appropriate control to the MAINTAINERS > > "K: ^pattern$" Does "that" above mean "not setting exact_pattern_match_hash", or "changing the patch so that it does set exact_pattern_match_hash". Sorry...