From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753887Ab3BOQxb (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:53:31 -0500 Received: from nat28.tlf.novell.com ([130.57.49.28]:43368 "EHLO nat28.tlf.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750967Ab3BOQxa convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:53:30 -0500 Message-Id: <511E761402000078000BEDD8@nat28.tlf.novell.com> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 12.0.1 Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:53:24 +0000 From: "Jan Beulich" To: "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" Cc: , , "xen-devel" , Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Patches for v3.9 for the Linux kernel. References: <20130215163451.GD13775@phenom.dumpdata.com> In-Reply-To: <20130215163451.GD13775@phenom.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>> On 15.02.13 at 17:34, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > I know that the PVH patches are not in the Xen tree. I am hoping that > at least the hypercalls _are_ OK with everybody so we can continue on > with this. Please don't commit to anything that isn't in the hypervisor tree yet. IOW I'd like you to not push the PVH bits that use uncommitted hypervisor interfaces (anything preparatory of course is okay). Jan