From: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: Make "noefi" really disable EFI runtime serivces
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:46:10 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51256042.5030704@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1361392572-25657-1-git-send-email-matt@console-pimps.org>
Hi Matt,
(2013/02/21 5:36), Matt Fleming wrote:
> From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
>
> commit 1de63d60cd5b ("efi: Clear EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES rather than
> EFI_BOOT by "noefi" boot parameter") attempted to make "noefi" true to
> its documentation and disable EFI runtime services to prevent the
> bricking bug described in commit e0094244e41c ("samsung-laptop:
> Disable on EFI hardware"). However, it's not possible to clear
> EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES from an early param function because
> EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES is set in efi_init() *after* parse_early_param().
>
> This resulted in "noefi" effectively becoming a no-op and no longer
> providing users with a way to disable EFI, which is bad for those
> users that have buggy machines.
Sorry, my patch was imperfect. This patch looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
Thanks,
Satoru
>
> Reported-by: Walt Nelson Jr <walt0924@gmail.com>
> Cc: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> index 928bf83..e2cd38f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> @@ -85,9 +85,10 @@ int efi_enabled(int facility)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(efi_enabled);
>
> +static bool disable_runtime = false;
> static int __init setup_noefi(char *arg)
> {
> - clear_bit(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES, &x86_efi_facility);
> + disable_runtime = true;
> return 0;
> }
> early_param("noefi", setup_noefi);
> @@ -734,7 +735,7 @@ void __init efi_init(void)
> if (!efi_is_native())
> pr_info("No EFI runtime due to 32/64-bit mismatch with kernel\n");
> else {
> - if (efi_runtime_init())
> + if (disable_runtime || efi_runtime_init())
> return;
> set_bit(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES, &x86_efi_facility);
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-20 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-20 20:36 Matt Fleming
2013-02-20 23:25 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Matt Fleming
2013-02-21 0:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-21 10:33 ` Matt Fleming
2013-02-21 17:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-20 23:46 ` Satoru Takeuchi [this message]
2013-02-20 23:50 ` [PATCH] " H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51256042.5030704@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
--cc=matt@console-pimps.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome