From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754874Ab3CPTc4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Mar 2013 15:32:56 -0400 Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:42636 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751092Ab3CPTcz (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Mar 2013 15:32:55 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,857,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="30062449" Message-ID: <5144C8DC.9010104@codeaurora.org> Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 12:32:44 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arnd Bergmann CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Stephen Warren , Kukjin Kim , Russell King , Srinidhi Kasagar , Tony Lindgren , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Sascha Hauer , Barry Song , Olof Johansson Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] ARM: Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries References: <1362007694-3419-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <512E9A39.3070207@wwwdotorg.org> <51354E35.1080804@codeaurora.org> <201303052234.32723.arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: <201303052234.32723.arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/5/2013 2:34 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 05 March 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> On 02/27/13 15:43, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> Seems simple enough it doesn't really need many, but for Tegra, >>> Acked-by: Stephen Warren >>> >>> Which kernel is this going into? It's possible Tegra will get converted >>> to multi-platform in 3.10, which might move that main ARCH_TEGRA block >>> from arch/arm/Kconfig into arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig, although I >>> suppose it doesn't have to move it. I think some/all(?) other >>> multi-platform conversions have moved their main Kconfig option like >>> that though. >> Thanks. I'm hoping that Arnd/Olof can pick this up. I'm not sure which >> version it will go into. >> > Hmm, it certainly looks useful to me. I think it should go into the next > cleanup branch as a base, so others can build on top of it. We will > also need it for the Exynos multiplatform patches that I hope can land > in 3.10 as well. > > Sneaking it in through the fixes branch would make life easier for us, > but it doesn't feel right. Arnd, can you pick this up into the arm-soc tree now? It would be good to get this into next so that conflicts are avoided later on. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation