mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, w.d.hubbs@gmail.com,
	rob@landley.net, mpagano@gentoo.org, ryao@gentoo.org,
	gregkh@gentoo.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init: fix name of root device in /proc/mounts
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:17:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5148F1F7.7080706@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130319222822.GA2338@linux1>

On 03/19/2013 03:28 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
> 
> I haven't heard any more on this patch, so I wanted to ping the
> thread again and find out the status.
> 
> The original message is linked below[1].
> 
> The issue is that /dev/root appears in /proc/mounts if you do not
> boot with an initramfs, but /dev/root is not a device node. In the
> past, udev created a symbolic link from /dev/root to the
> appropriate block device, but it does not do this any longer. Also,
> devtmpfs does not create this symbolic link.
> 
> This is causing bugs with software that depends on the existence
> of /dev/root [2] for example.
> 
> Do you need any more information on this patch, or is there some
> reason it can't go in?
> 

Seems okay to me, although even better would be to use the udev name
of the device in question.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.


  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-19 23:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-31 22:51 William Hubbs
2013-01-31 23:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-01 17:14   ` William Hubbs
2013-02-01 19:03     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-05  2:42   ` Rob Landley
2013-02-05  2:54     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-05  4:19       ` William Hubbs
2013-03-17 22:23       ` William Hubbs
2013-03-19 22:28       ` William Hubbs
2013-03-19 23:17         ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2013-03-20  0:20           ` William Hubbs
2013-03-20  0:24             ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-03-20  7:03             ` Rob Landley
2013-03-20 15:02               ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-03-20 21:11               ` William Hubbs
2013-03-20 21:46                 ` Kay Sievers
2013-03-22  3:00                 ` Rob Landley
2013-02-09 21:32 ` William Hubbs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5148F1F7.7080706@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=gregkh@gentoo.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpagano@gentoo.org \
    --cc=rob@landley.net \
    --cc=ryao@gentoo.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=w.d.hubbs@gmail.com \
    --cc=williamh@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome