mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	<cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH cgroup/for-3.10] cgroup: make cgroup_mutex outer to threadgroup_lock
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 08:58:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <514909A0.4030808@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130319220246.GR3042@htj.dyndns.org>

On 2013/3/20 6:02, Tejun Heo wrote:
> It doesn't make sense to nest cgroup_mutex inside threadgroup_lock
> when it should be outer to most all locks used by all cgroup
> controllers.  It was nested inside threadgroup_lock only because some
> controllers were abusing cgroup_mutex inside controllers leading to
> locking order inversion.
> 
> cgroup_mutex is no longer abused by controllers and can be put outer
> to threadgroup_lock.  Reverse the locking order in
> attach_task_by_pid().
> 

But the code contrast to the changelog. ;)

cgroup_mutex is currently outside of threadgroup_lock, and you're making
it nested inside threadgroup_lock in the code.

> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
> ---
> Li, can you please ack this?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
>  kernel/cgroup.c |   21 ++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
> index 04fa2ab..24106b8 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
> @@ -2134,17 +2134,13 @@ static int attach_task_by_pid(struct cgroup *cgrp, u64 pid, bool threadgroup)
>  	const struct cred *cred = current_cred(), *tcred;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (!cgroup_lock_live_group(cgrp))
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -
>  retry_find_task:
>  	rcu_read_lock();
>  	if (pid) {
>  		tsk = find_task_by_vpid(pid);
>  		if (!tsk) {
>  			rcu_read_unlock();
> -			ret= -ESRCH;
> -			goto out_unlock_cgroup;
> +			return -ESRCH;
>  		}
>  		/*
>  		 * even if we're attaching all tasks in the thread group, we
> @@ -2155,8 +2151,7 @@ retry_find_task:
>  		    !uid_eq(cred->euid, tcred->uid) &&
>  		    !uid_eq(cred->euid, tcred->suid)) {
>  			rcu_read_unlock();
> -			ret = -EACCES;
> -			goto out_unlock_cgroup;
> +			return -EACCES;
>  		}
>  	} else
>  		tsk = current;
> @@ -2170,9 +2165,8 @@ retry_find_task:
>  	 * with no rt_runtime allocated.  Just say no.
>  	 */
>  	if (tsk == kthreadd_task || (tsk->flags & PF_THREAD_BOUND)) {
> -		ret = -EINVAL;
>  		rcu_read_unlock();
> -		goto out_unlock_cgroup;
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
>  	get_task_struct(tsk);
> @@ -2194,13 +2188,14 @@ retry_find_task:
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = cgroup_attach_task(cgrp, tsk, threadgroup);
> +	ret = -ENODEV;
> +	if (cgroup_lock_live_group(cgrp)) {
> +		ret = cgroup_attach_task(cgrp, tsk, threadgroup);
> +		cgroup_unlock();
> +	}
>  
>  	threadgroup_unlock(tsk);
> -
>  	put_task_struct(tsk);
> -out_unlock_cgroup:
> -	cgroup_unlock();
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> .
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-20  0:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-06 22:36 lockdep trace from prepare_bprm_creds Dave Jones
2013-03-07 17:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-07 18:01   ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-07 18:03     ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-07 19:12       ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-07 19:38         ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-09  2:11           ` Li Zefan
2013-03-09  3:29             ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-09  7:47               ` Li Zefan
2013-03-09 20:00                 ` [PATCH 0/1] do not abuse ->cred_guard_mutex in threadgroup_lock() Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-09 20:01                   ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-09 20:15                     ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-11  1:50                     ` Li Zefan
2013-03-21 16:21                   ` [PATCH] " Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-21 22:06                     ` Andrew Morton
2013-03-22 13:20                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-19 22:02                 ` [PATCH cgroup/for-3.10] cgroup: make cgroup_mutex outer to threadgroup_lock Tejun Heo
2013-03-20  0:58                   ` Li Zefan [this message]
2013-03-20 15:03                     ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 18:35                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-20 18:42                         ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-21 16:17                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-07 18:21     ` lockdep trace from prepare_bprm_creds Tejun Heo
2013-03-07 18:32       ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-07 19:33         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=514909A0.4030808@huawei.com \
    --to=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome