From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756469Ab3C1HWP (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Mar 2013 03:22:15 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.65]:44128 "EHLO szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756442Ab3C1HWN (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Mar 2013 03:22:13 -0400 Message-ID: <5153EF7B.1020403@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:21:31 +0800 From: Li Zefan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar , Tejun Heo CC: Peter Zijlstra , LKML , Cgroups Subject: [PATCH 4/5] cpuacct: No need to check subsys active state References: <5153EF24.3040608@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <5153EF24.3040608@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.135.68.215] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Now we're guaranteed when cpuacct_charge() and cpuacct_account_field() are called, cpuacct has already been properly initialized, so we no longer need those checks. Signed-off-by: Li Zefan --- kernel/sched/cpuacct.c | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpuacct.c b/kernel/sched/cpuacct.c index 75e46d2..ef57ab6 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/cpuacct.c +++ b/kernel/sched/cpuacct.c @@ -247,9 +247,6 @@ void cpuacct_charge(struct task_struct *tsk, u64 cputime) struct cpuacct *ca; int cpu; - if (unlikely(!cpuacct_subsys.active)) - return; - cpu = task_cpu(tsk); rcu_read_lock(); @@ -278,9 +275,6 @@ void cpuacct_account_field(struct task_struct *p, int index, u64 val) struct kernel_cpustat *kcpustat; struct cpuacct *ca; - if (unlikely(!cpuacct_subsys.active)) - return; - rcu_read_lock(); ca = task_ca(p); while (ca != &root_cpuacct) { -- 1.8.0.2