From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com,
hpa@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, rafael@kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] intel_pstate: delete scheduler hook in HWP mode
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 02:09:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51646263.RzQfqm1Mfo@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8554c677900ad6bcb308f4afe1099aead3cfebd3.1496889051.git.len.brown@intel.com>
On Wednesday, June 07, 2017 07:39:16 PM Len Brown wrote:
> From: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
>
> The cpufreqa/scaling_cur_freq sysfs attribute is now provided by
> the x86 cpufreq core on all modern x86 systems, including
> all systems supported by the intel_pstate driver.
Not sure what you mean by "x86 cpufreq core"?
Besides, I'd reorder this change with respect to patch [4/5] as this
eliminates the hook entirely and then the "performance"-related change
would only affect non-HWP.
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-17 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-08 2:39 [PATCH 0/5] x86, cpufreq: consolidate APERF/MPERF calculation Len Brown
2017-06-08 2:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86: do not use cpufreq_quick_get() for /proc/cpuinfo "cpu MHz" Len Brown
2017-06-08 2:39 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: use common aperfmperf_khz_on_cpu() to calculate KHz using APERF/MPERF Len Brown
2017-06-17 0:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-06-17 1:49 ` Len Brown
2017-06-19 12:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-06-19 14:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-06-08 2:39 ` [PATCH 3/5] intel_pstate: remove intel_pstate.get() Len Brown
2017-06-16 23:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-06-17 0:35 ` Len Brown
2017-06-17 0:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-06-17 1:10 ` Len Brown
2017-06-17 1:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-06-17 1:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-06-17 2:06 ` Len Brown
2017-06-17 0:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-06-08 2:39 ` [PATCH 4/5] intel_pstate: skip scheduler hook when in "performance" mode Len Brown
2017-06-17 0:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-06-17 0:52 ` Len Brown
2017-06-17 1:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-06-17 1:31 ` Len Brown
2017-06-17 1:35 ` Len Brown
2017-06-08 2:39 ` [PATCH 5/5] intel_pstate: delete scheduler hook in HWP mode Len Brown
2017-06-17 0:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2017-06-17 1:27 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51646263.RzQfqm1Mfo@aspire.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®