From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:36:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:36:37 -0400 Received: from shed.alex.org.uk ([195.224.53.219]:2449 "HELO shed.alex.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:36:23 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 20:36:37 +0100 From: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel Reply-To: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel To: Daniel Phillips , Alex Bligh - linux-kernel , Helge Hafting , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel Subject: Re: [resent PATCH] Re: very slow parallel read performance Message-ID: <516781015.998944596@[169.254.198.40]> In-Reply-To: <20010827155621Z16272-32385+261@humbolt.nl.linux.org> In-Reply-To: <20010827155621Z16272-32385+261@humbolt.nl.linux.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.0b3 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --On Monday, 27 August, 2001 6:02 PM +0200 Daniel Phillips wrote: > On the other hand, we > will penalize faster streams that way Penalizing faster streams for the same number of pages is probably a good thing as they cost less time to replace. -- Alex Bligh