mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Bryan O'Donoghue" <bryan.odonoghue.lkml@nexus-software.ie>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	fenghua.yu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Add check for P5 to microcode_intel_early
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 10:24:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51725ED4.8020001@nexus-software.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5171CF86.30708@zytor.com>

On 20/04/13 00:13, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 04/19/2013 02:44 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 19/04/13 22:25, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:55:15PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>>> Just filter out P5 and earlier. The code already does that for CPUs
>>>> which don't have CPUID.
>>>
>>> Actually, an alternative - more practical albeit not very accurate
>>
>> More practical ? Hmm - the MSRs don't exist for<  P5
>>
>>> solution would be to check for which families Intel delivers microcode
>>> and do the cut off there with a comment as to why you do it like
>>> that.void
>>
>> You mean return !intel so this function will never be called.
>>
>> __init load_ucode_bsp(void)
>> {
>>          int vendor = x86_vendor();
>>
>>          if (vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
>>                  load_ucode_intel_bsp();
>> }
>>
>> Ah yes. That would work and be less code.
>>
>> We should do it that way.
>
> Do you think you can have a patch for me in the next few hours?

Sure.

I'm in Ireland (sleeping @ 00:15 on a Friday night sadly).

Give me ~ 40 minutes


  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-20  9:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-19 17:23 Bryan O'Donoghue
2013-04-19 19:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-19 20:35   ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2013-04-19 20:55     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-19 21:25       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-19 21:44         ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2013-04-19 22:02           ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-19 23:13           ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-20  9:24             ` Bryan O'Donoghue [this message]
2013-04-20 15:52               ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-20  0:20 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, microcode: Verify the family before dispatching microcode patching tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-20 16:21   ` Bryan O'Donoghue

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51725ED4.8020001@nexus-software.ie \
    --to=bryan.odonoghue.lkml@nexus-software.ie \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome