From: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
To: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <alex.williamson@redhat.com>, <kevin.tian@intel.com>, <jgg@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio: Get/put KVM only for the first/last vfio_df_open/close in cdev path
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 13:08:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5187229e-3f0f-4af3-b3f9-4debf68220fd@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240628151845.22166-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
On 2024/6/28 23:18, Yan Zhao wrote:
> In the device cdev path, adjust the handling of the KVM reference count to
> only increment with the first vfio_df_open() and decrement after the final
> vfio_df_close(). This change addresses a KVM reference leak that occurs
> when a device cdev file is opened multiple times and attempts to bind to
> iommufd repeatedly.
>
> Currently, vfio_df_get_kvm_safe() is invoked prior to each vfio_df_open()
> in the cdev path during iommufd binding. The corresponding
> vfio_device_put_kvm() is executed either when iommufd is unbound or if an
> error occurs during the binding process.
>
> However, issues arise when a device binds to iommufd more than once. The
> second vfio_df_open() will fail during iommufd binding, and
> vfio_device_put_kvm() will be triggered, setting device->kvm to NULL.
> Consequently, when iommufd is unbound from the first successfully bound
> device, vfio_device_put_kvm() becomes ineffective, leading to a leak in the
> KVM reference count.
Good catch!!!
> Below is the calltrace that will be produced in this scenario when the KVM
> module is unloaded afterwards, reporting "BUG kvm_vcpu (Tainted: G S):
> Objects remaining in kvm_vcpu on __kmem_cache_shutdown()".
>
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> dump_stack_lvl+0x80/0xc0
> slab_err+0xb0/0xf0
> ? __kmem_cache_shutdown+0xc1/0x4e0
> ? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0x50
> ? lock_acquired+0x144/0x3c0
> __kmem_cache_shutdown+0x1b7/0x4e0
> kmem_cache_destroy+0xa6/0x260
> kvm_exit+0x80/0xc0 [kvm]
> vmx_exit+0xe/0x20 [kvm_intel]
> __x64_sys_delete_module+0x143/0x250
> ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0xd3/0xe0
> ? syscall_trace_enter+0x143/0x210
> do_syscall_64+0x6f/0x140
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
>
> Fixes: 5fcc26969a16 ("vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD")
> Signed-off-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> index bb1817bd4ff3..3b85d01d1b27 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ long vfio_df_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> {
> struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd bind;
> + bool put_kvm = false;
> unsigned long minsz;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -101,12 +102,15 @@ long vfio_df_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> }
>
> /*
> - * Before the device open, get the KVM pointer currently
> + * Before the device's first open, get the KVM pointer currently
> * associated with the device file (if there is) and obtain
> - * a reference. This reference is held until device closed.
> + * a reference. This reference is held until device's last closed.
> * Save the pointer in the device for use by drivers.
> */
> - vfio_df_get_kvm_safe(df);
> + if (device->open_count == 0) {
> + vfio_df_get_kvm_safe(df);
> + put_kvm = true;
> + }
>
> ret = vfio_df_open(df);
> if (ret)
> @@ -129,7 +133,8 @@ long vfio_df_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> out_close_device:
> vfio_df_close(df);
> out_put_kvm:
> - vfio_device_put_kvm(device);
> + if (put_kvm)
you may use if (device->open_count == 0) as well here to save a bool.
Otherwise looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> + vfio_device_put_kvm(device);
> iommufd_ctx_put(df->iommufd);
> df->iommufd = NULL;
> out_unlock:
>
> base-commit: 6ba59ff4227927d3a8530fc2973b80e94b54d58f
BTW. The vfio_device_get_kvm_safe() is not supposed to be invoked multiple
times by design as the second call would override the device->put_kvm and
device->kvm. This does not change the put_kvm nor the kvm though. But not a
good thing anyghow. maybe worth a warn like below.
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index ee72c0b61795..a4bead0e5820 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -408,6 +408,8 @@ void vfio_device_get_kvm_safe(struct vfio_device
*device, struct kvm *kvm)
if (!kvm)
return;
+ WARN_ON(device->put_kvm || device->kvm);
+
pfn = symbol_get(kvm_put_kvm);
if (WARN_ON(!pfn))
return;
--
Regards,
Yi Liu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-01 5:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-28 15:18 Yan Zhao
2024-07-01 5:08 ` Yi Liu [this message]
2024-07-01 5:42 ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-01 6:01 ` Yi Liu
2024-07-01 8:43 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-07-01 10:30 ` Yi Liu
2024-07-01 12:02 ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-02 0:17 ` Tian, Kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5187229e-3f0f-4af3-b3f9-4debf68220fd@intel.com \
--to=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®