From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
avi.kivity@gmail.com, mtosatti@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] KVM: MMU: fast invalidate all pages
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 15:49:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5194E3D7.2090808@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130516134130.GD14597@redhat.com>
Il 16/05/2013 15:41, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 03:14:35PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 16/05/2013 14:43, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
>>>>> +restart:
>>>>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(sp, node, &kvm->arch.active_mmu_pages, link) {
>>>>> + if (!is_obsolete_sp(kvm, sp))
>>>>> + continue;
>>> What if we save kvm->arch.active_mmu_pages on the stack and init
>>> kvm->arch.active_mmu_pages to be empty at the entrance to
>>> zap_invalid_pages(). This loop will iterate over saved list. This will
>>> allow us to drop the is_obsolete_sp() check and will save time since we
>>> will not be iterating over newly created sps.
>>>
>>
>> But when you add cond_resched_lock a thread may want to zap pages itself
>> (e.g. from prepare_zap_oldest_mmu_page) and it won't find them.
>>
> Yes, this will break mmu pages accounting. We can make
> prepare_zap_oldest_mmu_page() wait while zap_invalid_pages()
> frees needed amount of pages if one is in progress.
>
>> Here is another proposal... The idea is to avoid looking at new pages
>> more than necessary after a "goto restart".
>>
>> Basically, you alternate between two phases:
>>
>> - look for pages to be zapped, group them together
>>
>> - zap the pages
>>
>> Something like:
>>
>> moved = 0;
>> restart:
>> zapping = true;
>> for each page in active_mmu_pages [reverse and safe] {
>> if (!is_obsolete || invalid) {
>> /*
>> * Found a new page, stop zapping for now and
>> * try to segregate the invalid ones at one end
>> * of the list.
>> */
>> zapping = false;
>> continue;
>> }
>>
>> if (batch > 10 && ...) {
>> cond_resched_lock
>> batch = 0;
>> goto restart;
>> }
>>
>> if (!zapping) {
>> /*
>> * Segregate pages to one end of the list where
>> * new pages don't get in the way.
>> */
>> list_move_tail(page, active_mmu_pages)
>> batch++; /* or maybe not? */
>> moved++;
>> } else {
>> batch += prepare_zap_page
>> goto restart;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> /* Need another pass to look at segregated pages? */
>> if (moved) {
>> moved = 0;
>> goto restart;
>> }
> Not sure what are you trying to achieve with "moved" tricks. Just
> walking the list from the end and stopping on first valid sp should be
> enough since active_mmu_pages list is a FIFO right now.
Right, I missed that "sp->role.invalid = 1" will ensure anyway that
pages are visited at most twice.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-16 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-16 12:17 [PATCH v5 0/8] KVM: MMU: fast zap all shadow pages Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-16 12:17 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] KVM: MMU: drop unnecessary kvm_reload_remote_mmus Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-16 12:17 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] KVM: MMU: delete shadow page from hash list in kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-16 12:17 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] KVM: MMU: fast invalidate all pages Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-16 12:43 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-16 13:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-16 13:41 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-16 13:49 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-05-16 13:25 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-16 13:43 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-16 15:57 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-16 18:39 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-16 19:57 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-16 16:18 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-16 18:40 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-16 12:17 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] KVM: x86: use the fast way to " Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-16 16:19 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-16 18:45 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-16 12:17 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] KVM: MMU: make kvm_mmu_zap_all preemptable Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-16 12:17 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] KVM: MMU: show mmu_valid_gen in shadow page related tracepoints Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-16 12:17 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] KVM: MMU: add tracepoint for kvm_mmu_invalidate_memslot_pages Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-16 12:17 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] KVM: MMU: zap pages in batch Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-16 12:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-16 13:31 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-16 12:20 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] KVM: MMU: fast zap all shadow pages Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-16 14:36 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-05-16 18:26 ` Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5194E3D7.2090808@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=avi.kivity@gmail.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome