From: Roman Gushchin <klamm@yandex-team.ru>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
zhmurov@yandex-team.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rcu: fix a race in hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu macro
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 15:34:31 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51A344C7.9040402@yandex-team.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130525113715.GA3795@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 25.05.2013 15:37, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> 2) A problem occurs when restart_condition is true and we jump to the begin label.
>> We do not recalculate (head + offsetof(head, first)) address, we just dereference
>> again the OLD (head->first) pointer. So, we get a node, that WAS the first node in a
>> previous time instead of current first node. That node can be dead, or, for instance,
>> can be a head of another chain.
>
> OK, this is what I was referring to when I said that the RCU list macros
> assume that the list header is static (or equivalently, appropriately
> protected).
>
> With some_func() as written above, you would need to return some sort
> of failure indication from some_func(), and have the caller refetch head.
> Otherwise, as far as gcc is concerned, the value of the parameter head
> is constant throughout some_func().
Personally I have nothing against this approach, but I'm not sure, if
networking maintainers will adopt corresponding patch. I'll try to find it out.
>
>> It is correct from gcc's point of view, since it doesn't expect the head pointer
>> to change, and this address is just (head + constant offset).
>
> Agreed.
>
> How does the caller calculate the value to pass in through the argument "head"?
struct sock *__udp4_lib_lookup(struct net *net, __be32 saddr,
__be16 sport, __be32 daddr, __be16 dport,
int dif, struct udp_table *udptable)
{
...
unsigned int hash2, slot2, slot = udp_hashfn(net, hnum, udptable->mask);
struct udp_hslot *hslot2, *hslot = &udptable->hash[slot];
int score, badness;
rcu_read_lock();
if (hslot->count > 10) {
hash2 = udp4_portaddr_hash(net, daddr, hnum);
slot2 = hash2 & udptable->mask;
hslot2 = &udptable->hash2[slot2];
...
result = udp4_lib_lookup2(net, saddr, sport,
daddr, hnum, dif,
hslot2, slot2);
...
}
static struct sock *udp4_lib_lookup2(struct net *net,
__be32 saddr, __be16 sport,
__be32 daddr, unsigned int hnum, int dif,
struct udp_hslot *hslot2, unsigned int slot2)
{
...
udp_portaddr_for_each_entry_rcu(sk, node, &hslot2->head) {
...
Thank you!
Regards,
Roman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-27 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-21 9:05 [PATCH] " Roman Gushchin
2013-05-21 10:40 ` David Laight
2013-05-21 11:55 ` Roman Gushchin
2013-05-21 13:42 ` David Laight
2013-05-21 12:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-21 12:46 ` Roman Gushchin
2013-05-21 12:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-21 13:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-21 13:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-21 14:47 ` Roman Gushchin
2013-05-21 15:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-21 15:51 ` Roman Gushchin
2013-05-21 15:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-21 15:51 ` Roman Gushchin
2013-05-21 18:12 ` [PATCH v2] " Roman Gushchin
2013-05-22 2:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-22 5:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-22 11:58 ` Roman Gushchin
2013-05-22 12:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-22 13:07 ` Roman Gushchin
2013-05-22 17:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-22 19:17 ` Roman Gushchin
2013-05-25 11:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-27 11:34 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2013-05-27 17:55 ` Roman Gushchin
2013-05-28 0:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-28 9:10 ` Roman Gushchin
2013-05-29 0:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-29 1:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-29 5:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-29 10:09 ` Roman Gushchin
2013-05-29 19:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-30 8:25 ` Roman Gushchin
2013-06-02 23:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-03 2:58 ` David Miller
2013-06-03 3:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-03 3:27 ` David Miller
2013-06-03 3:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-06-03 3:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-03 3:49 ` David Miller
2013-06-03 6:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-06-10 18:29 ` Boris B. Zhmurov
2013-06-10 18:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-03 3:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-06-03 3:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-29 9:17 ` Roman Gushchin
2013-05-29 1:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-22 13:27 ` David Laight
2013-05-22 13:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-22 14:23 ` David Laight
2013-05-22 13:55 ` Roman Gushchin
2013-05-22 9:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-22 12:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-22 13:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-22 14:16 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51A344C7.9040402@yandex-team.ru \
--to=klamm@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
--cc=zhmurov@yandex-team.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®