mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
To: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	efault@gmx.de, pjt@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, arjan@linux.intel.com,
	len.brown@intel.com, corbet@lwn.net, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [RFC] Comparison of power-efficient scheduling patch sets
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 16:23:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51A85E0A.5070806@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51A7FA14.70902@intel.com>

On 05/31/2013 09:17 AM, Alex Shi wrote:
>> > Kernel: 3.9
>> > 
>> > Patch sets:
>> > rlb-v4: sched: use runnable load based balance (Alex Shi)
>> >         <https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/27/13>
> Thanks for the valuable comparison!
> 
> The runnable load balance target is performance. It is still try to
> disperse tasks to as much as possible CPUs. :)
> The latest v7 version remove the 6th patch(wake_affine change) in v4.
> and plus fix a slept time double counting issue, and remove
> blocked_load_avg in tg load.
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1498988

Even the rlb patch set target is performance, Maybe the power benefit is
due to better balancing?

Anyway I appreciate if you like to test the latest v7 version. :)
https://github.com/alexshi/power-scheduling.git runnablelb

-- 
Thanks
    Alex

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-31  8:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-30 13:47 Morten Rasmussen
2013-05-31  1:17 ` Alex Shi
2013-05-31  8:23   ` Alex Shi [this message]
2013-05-31 10:52 ` power-efficient scheduling design Ingo Molnar
2013-06-03 14:59   ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-06-03 15:43     ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-04 15:03   ` Morten Rasmussen
2013-06-07  6:26     ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-06-20 15:23     ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-05  9:56   ` Amit Kucheria
2013-06-07  6:03   ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-06-07 14:51     ` Catalin Marinas
2013-06-07 18:08       ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-06-07 17:36         ` David Lang
2013-06-09  4:33           ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-06-08 11:28         ` Catalin Marinas
2013-06-08 14:02           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-09  3:42             ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-06-09 22:53               ` Catalin Marinas
2013-06-10 16:25               ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-06-12  0:27                 ` David Lang
2013-06-12  1:48                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-06-12  9:48                     ` Amit Kucheria
2013-06-12 16:22                       ` David Lang
2013-06-12 10:20                     ` Catalin Marinas
2013-06-12 15:24                       ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-06-12 17:04                         ` Catalin Marinas
2013-06-12  9:50                   ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-06-12 16:30                     ` David Lang
2013-06-11  0:50               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13  4:32                 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-06-09  4:23           ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-06-07 15:23     ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-06-14 16:05   ` Morten Rasmussen
2013-06-17 11:23     ` Catalin Marinas
2013-06-18  1:37     ` David Lang
2013-06-18 10:23       ` Morten Rasmussen
2013-06-18 17:39         ` David Lang
2013-06-19 12:39           ` Morten Rasmussen
2013-06-18 15:20     ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-06-18 17:47       ` David Lang
2013-06-18 19:36         ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-06-19 15:39         ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-06-19 17:00           ` Morten Rasmussen
2013-06-19 17:08             ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-06-21  8:50               ` Morten Rasmussen
2013-06-21 15:29                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-06-21 15:38                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-06-21 21:23                   ` Catalin Marinas
2013-06-21 21:34                     ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-06-23 23:32                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-24 10:07                         ` Catalin Marinas
2013-06-24 15:26                         ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-06-24 21:59                           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-24 23:10                             ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-06-18 19:06       ` Catalin Marinas
2013-06-21 15:06       ` Morten Rasmussen
2013-06-23 10:55         ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51A85E0A.5070806@intel.com \
    --to=alex.shi@intel.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome