From: George Cherian <george.cherian@ti.com>
To: <balbi@ti.com>
Cc: <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: host: xhci-plat: Enable XHCI_SPURIOUS_SUCCESS quirk for xhci-plat
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:46:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51CADB9D.3070206@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130626090213.GQ12640@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
On 6/26/2013 2:32 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 02:28:57PM +0530, George Cherian wrote:
>> Synopsis xhci controllers with hci_version > 0.96 gives spurious success
>> events on short packet completion. During webcam capture the
>> "ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA ptr not part of current TD" was observed.
>> The same application works fine with synopsis controllers hci_version 0.96.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: George Cherian<george.cherian@ti.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c | 10 ++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c
>> index 93ad67e..e63c6d3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c
>> @@ -25,6 +25,16 @@ static void xhci_plat_quirks(struct device *dev, struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
>> * dev struct in order to setup MSI
>> */
>> xhci->quirks |= XHCI_BROKEN_MSI;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * In some xhci controllers which follows xhci 1.0 spec gives a spurious
>> + * success event after a short transfer. This quirk will ignore such
>> + * spurious event. Hit this issue in synopsis xhci controllers with
>> + * hci_version > 0.96
>> + */
>> +
>> + if (xhci->hci_version > 0x96)
>> + xhci->quirks |= XHCI_SPURIOUS_SUCCESS;
>> }
> doesn't look like the correct way to do this. What if enabling that
> quirk on hosts which don't have the quirk cause problems ?
For a controller which does not have this issue will never get a
spurious success for short packet ( and that too for only ISOCH).
per this commit ad808333d Intel xhci: Ignore spurious successful event.
This spurious successful event behavior isn't technically disallowed by
the xHCI specification, so make the xHCI driver just ignore the spurious
completion event.
> I would suggest adding a platform_data which (in our case) dwc3 will
> pass to xhci-plat. Then you can do proper revision detection of the
> synopsys controller and set the quirk only on the failing hosts.
>
> BTW, do you have the STARS number for this errata ?
No STARS number yet.
Regards
-George
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-26 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-26 8:58 George Cherian
2013-06-26 9:02 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-06-26 12:16 ` George Cherian [this message]
2013-06-26 12:25 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-06-26 16:53 ` Sarah Sharp
2013-06-30 21:00 ` Sarah Sharp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51CADB9D.3070206@ti.com \
--to=george.cherian@ti.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome