mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] metag: smp: don't spin waiting for CPU to start
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 11:42:39 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D26F57.8030400@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372694659-30176-4-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com>

On 07/01/2013 09:34 PM, James Hogan wrote:
> Use a completion to block until a secondary CPU has started up, like ARM
> do, instead of a loop of udelays.
> 
> On Meta, SMP is really SMT, with each "CPU" being a different hardware
> thread on the same Meta processor core, so as well as being more
> efficient and latency friendly, using a completion prevents the bogomips
> of the secondary CPU from being drastically skewed every time by the
> execution of the tight in-cache udelay loop on the other CPU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
> Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat


>  arch/metag/kernel/smp.c | 16 ++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/metag/kernel/smp.c b/arch/metag/kernel/smp.c
> index 09979f2..e413875 100644
> --- a/arch/metag/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/metag/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>   * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>   */
>  #include <linux/atomic.h>
> +#include <linux/completion.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> @@ -62,6 +63,8 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct ipi_data, ipi_data) = {
> 
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(boot_lock);
> 
> +static DECLARE_COMPLETION(cpu_running);
> +
>  /*
>   * "thread" is assumed to be a valid Meta hardware thread ID.
>   */
> @@ -235,20 +238,12 @@ int __cpuinit __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
>  	 */
>  	ret = boot_secondary(thread, idle);
>  	if (ret == 0) {
> -		unsigned long timeout;
> -
>  		/*
>  		 * CPU was successfully started, wait for it
>  		 * to come online or time out.
>  		 */
> -		timeout = jiffies + HZ;
> -		while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
> -			if (cpu_online(cpu))
> -				break;
> -
> -			udelay(10);
> -			barrier();
> -		}
> +		wait_for_completion_timeout(&cpu_running,
> +					    msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
> 
>  		if (!cpu_online(cpu))
>  			ret = -EIO;
> @@ -391,6 +386,7 @@ asmlinkage void secondary_start_kernel(void)
>  	 * OK, now it's safe to let the boot CPU continue
>  	 */
>  	set_cpu_online(cpu, true);
> +	complete(&cpu_running);
> 
>  	/*
>  	 * Enable local interrupts.
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-02  6:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-01 16:04 [PATCH 0/5] metag: smp/hotplug fixes James Hogan
2013-07-01 16:04 ` [PATCH 1/5] metag: use clear_tasks_mm_cpumask() James Hogan
2013-07-01 16:04 ` [PATCH 2/5] metag: smp: enable irqs after set_cpu_online James Hogan
2013-07-01 21:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-07-02  5:57   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-07-01 16:04 ` [PATCH 3/5] metag: smp: don't spin waiting for CPU to start James Hogan
2013-07-01 21:46   ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-07-01 22:02     ` James Hogan
2013-07-02  6:12   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
2013-07-01 16:04 ` [PATCH 4/5] metag: kick: prevent nested kick handlers James Hogan
2013-07-01 21:51   ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-07-01 22:17     ` James Hogan
2013-07-01 22:56       ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-07-02  0:00         ` James Hogan
2013-07-01 16:04 ` [PATCH 5/5] metag: cpu hotplug: route_irq: preserve irq mask James Hogan
2013-07-01 21:51   ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-07-02  6:16   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-07-02  9:59     ` James Hogan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51D26F57.8030400@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome