From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
To: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Cc: "myungjoo.ham@samsung.com" <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"rob@landley.net" <rob@landley.net>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kishon@ti.com" <kishon@ti.com>,
"gg@slimlogic.co.uk" <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] extcon: palmas: Option to disable ID/VBUS detection based on platform
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 08:38:11 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51DE219B.7000109@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51DE1B99.6090403@samsung.com>
On Thursday 11 July 2013 08:12 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi Laxman,
>
>> static int palmas_usb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> @@ -137,20 +140,26 @@ static int palmas_usb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> struct palmas_usb *palmas_usb;
>> int status;
>>
>> - if (node && !pdata) {
>> - pdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
>> -
>> - if (!pdata)
>> - return -ENOMEM;
>> + palmas_usb = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*palmas_usb), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!palmas_usb)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> - pdata->wakeup = of_property_read_bool(node, "ti,wakeup");
>> + if (node && !pdata) {
>> + palmas_usb->wakeup = of_property_read_bool(node, "ti,wakeup");
>> + palmas_usb->enable_id_detection = of_property_read_bool(node,
>> + "ti,enable-id-detection");
>> + palmas_usb->enable_vbus_detection = of_property_read_bool(node,
>> + "ti,enable-vbus-detection");
>> + } else if (pdata) {
>> + palmas_usb->wakeup = pdata->wakeup;
>> + palmas_usb->enable_id_detection = true;
>> + palmas_usb->enable_vbus_detection = true;
>> } else if (!pdata) {
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> + palmas_usb->wakeup = true;
>> + palmas_usb->enable_id_detection = true;
>> + palmas_usb->enable_vbus_detection = true;
>> }
> I think we could modify it as following patch to remove duplicate line.
> If you agree about below modification, I will apply your patch with following patch.
>
I am fine with this and this looks simple and straight.
I have seen some patches/discussion from TI to remove the platform data
support at all and hence removing from here in future will be very simple.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-11 2:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-10 9:29 Laxman Dewangan
2013-07-11 2:42 ` Chanwoo Choi
2013-07-11 3:08 ` Laxman Dewangan [this message]
2013-07-11 4:30 ` Chanwoo Choi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51DE219B.7000109@nvidia.com \
--to=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=gg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome