mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Remoteproc v3.10 arm-microblaze
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:16:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E68B22.9070704@monstr.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2dca3652-e141-4f9e-934e-29b7c4334b41@CH1EHSMHS037.ehs.local>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2105 bytes --]

Hi,

On 07/17/2013 01:37 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Ohad,
> 
> I am working on another remoteproc driver.
> Currently less problematic than arm-arm.
> It is arm to microblaze on zynq.
> 
> I have two problems:
> 1. I need to allocate carveout first because my firmware must be added to that
> space first. (I don't have any other mapping mechanism ready for use)
> I have simple solution I am calling rproc_handle_resources in rproc_fw_config_virtio()
> just for carveouts before rproc_count_vrings_handler and rproc_vdev_handler are called
> which ensure that carveout is allocated first.
> 
> 2. I am getting problem with rproc_handle_vdev().
> Here is the flow which I see:
> request_firmware_nowait() calls
> rproc_fw_config_virtio() calls
> rproc_handle_vdev() calls
> rproc_add_virtio_dev() calls
> register_virtio_device() calls dev->config->reset() without setup pointer rproc->table_ptr().
> 
> But rproc->table_ptr is setup in rproc_fw_boot()
> which is called from rproc_boot() much later.
> 
> Which is causing that all rproc_virtio_config_ops operations
> are using incorrect table_ptr().
> Problematic for me are rproc_virtio_get_status, rproc_virtio_set_status
> and especially rproc_virtio_reset();
> 
> And with BUG_ON I am getting problem virtio_dev_remove() where status should
> be zero - WARN_ON_ONCE(dev->config->get_status(dev));
> 
> Below is log with some of my debug messages. (comments explain what's going on there)

Let me correct myself. It is caused by switching from loaded_table back to cached_table
in rproc_shutdown where old cached_table is probably used and there are probably be still old values.

What's the purpose of cached_table? Shouldn't be synchronized with loaded one in rproc shutdown?

Thanks,
Michal

-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 263 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2013-07-17 12:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-17 11:37 Michal Simek
2013-07-17 12:16 ` Michal Simek [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51E68B22.9070704@monstr.eu \
    --to=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome