From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
sbw@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC nohz_full 7/7] nohz_full: Force RCU's grace-period kthreads onto timekeeping CPU
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:36:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F5E325.4000607@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374880764-14248-7-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 07/27/2013 07:19 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Because RCU's quiescent-state-forcing mechanism is used to drive the
> full-system-idle state machine, and because this mechanism is executed
> by RCU's grace-period kthreads, this commit forces these kthreads to
> run on the timekeeping CPU (tick_do_timer_cpu). To do otherwise would
> mean that the RCU grace-period kthreads would force the system into
> non-idle state every time they drove the state machine, which would
> be just a bit on the futile side.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> ---
> kernel/rcutree.c | 1 +
> kernel/rcutree.h | 1 +
> kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index aa6d96e..fe83085 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -1286,6 +1286,7 @@ static int rcu_gp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> struct rcu_data *rdp;
> struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
>
> + rcu_bind_gp_kthread();
> raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
> rsp->gp_flags = 0; /* Clear all flags: New grace period. */
bind the gp thread when RCU_GP_FLAG_INIT ...
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h
> index e0de5dc..49dac99 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
> @@ -560,6 +560,7 @@ static void rcu_sysidle_check_cpu(struct rcu_data *rdp, bool *isidle,
> static bool is_sysidle_rcu_state(struct rcu_state *rsp);
> static void rcu_sysidle_report_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp, int isidle,
> unsigned long maxj);
> +static void rcu_bind_gp_kthread(void);
> static void rcu_sysidle_init_percpu_data(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp);
>
> #endif /* #ifndef RCU_TREE_NONCORE */
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> index ff84bed..f65d9c2 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> @@ -2544,7 +2544,7 @@ static void rcu_sysidle_check_cpu(struct rcu_data *rdp, bool *isidle,
> if (!*isidle || rdp->rsp != rcu_sysidle_state ||
> cpu_is_offline(rdp->cpu) || rdp->cpu == tick_do_timer_cpu)
> return;
> - /* WARN_ON_ONCE(smp_processor_id() != tick_do_timer_cpu); */
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(smp_processor_id() != tick_do_timer_cpu);
but call rcu_sysidle_check_cpu() when RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS.
In this time, the thread may not be bound to tick_do_timer_cpu,
the WARN_ON_ONCE() may be wrong.
Does any other code ensure the gp thread bound on tick_do_timer_cpu
which I missed?
>
> /* Pick up current idle and NMI-nesting counter and check. */
> cur = atomic_read(&rdtp->dynticks_idle);
> @@ -2570,6 +2570,20 @@ static bool is_sysidle_rcu_state(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> }
>
> /*
> + * Bind the grace-period kthread for the sysidle flavor of RCU to the
> + * timekeeping CPU.
> + */
> +static void rcu_bind_gp_kthread(void)
> +{
> + int cpu = ACCESS_ONCE(tick_do_timer_cpu);
> +
> + if (cpu < 0 || cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
> + return;
> + if (raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu)
> + set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(cpu));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> * Return a delay in jiffies based on the number of CPUs, rcu_node
> * leaf fanout, and jiffies tick rate. The idea is to allow larger
> * systems more time to transition to full-idle state in order to
> @@ -2767,6 +2781,10 @@ static bool is_sysidle_rcu_state(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> return false;
> }
>
> +static void rcu_bind_gp_kthread(void)
> +{
> +}
> +
> static void rcu_sysidle_report_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp, int isidle,
> unsigned long maxj)
> {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-29 3:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-26 23:18 [PATCH RFC nohz_full 0/7] v4 Provide infrastructure for full-system idle Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-26 23:19 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full 1/7] nohz_full: Add Kconfig parameter for scalable detection of all-idle state Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-26 23:19 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full 2/7] nohz_full: Add rcu_dyntick data " Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-05 1:26 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-07-26 23:19 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full 3/7] nohz_full: Add per-CPU idle-state tracking Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-09 15:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-07-26 23:19 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full 4/7] nohz_full: Add full-system idle states and variables Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-09 15:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-07-26 23:19 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full 5/7] nohz_full: Add full-system-idle arguments to API Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-26 23:19 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full 6/7] nohz_full: Add full-system-idle state machine Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-29 8:19 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-07-29 17:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-09 16:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-14 3:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-26 23:19 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full 7/7] nohz_full: Force RCU's grace-period kthreads onto timekeeping CPU Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-29 3:36 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2013-07-29 16:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-29 16:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-07-29 17:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-30 1:40 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-07-30 17:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-29 3:35 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full 1/7] nohz_full: Add Kconfig parameter for scalable detection of all-idle state Lai Jiangshan
2013-07-29 15:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-05 1:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-17 23:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-07-09 1:29 [PATCH RFC nohz_full 0/7] v3 Provide infrastructure for full-system idle Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-09 1:30 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full 1/7] nohz_full: Add Kconfig parameter for scalable detection of all-idle state Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-09 1:30 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full 7/7] nohz_full: Force RCU's grace-period kthreads onto timekeeping CPU Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51F5E325.4000607@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sbw@mit.edu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome