From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
<ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] [ATTEND] DT, maintainership, development process
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 12:31:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F698DE.4010300@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130729081141.00818596@lwn.net>
On 13-07-29 10:11 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:10:33 +0200
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>
>> That actually is simple enough.
>>
>> Check out the Linus' master branch and do
>>
>> $ git log --ancestry-path --merges <commit>..
>
> So I picked a recent, single-signoff patch mostly at random:
>
> 8ade62857ef77bdf639185410fbcd811aa700cb2
>
> That "git log" command gives me 156 intervening commits involving at least
> a dozen networking trees, along with virtio, parisc, blackfin, x86, ...
> Even if one stops looking at the first merge performed by Linus, that's 47
> to look at. Did that patch really pass through all those peoples' hands?
Try this:
$ git describe --contains 8ade62857ef77bdf6391
v3.11-rc1~16^2~103^2^2~5^2~25
Looks scary, but lets deconstruct it right to left a chunk at
a time v3.11-rc1 ~16 ^2 ~103 ^2 ^2 ~5 ^2 ~25
So, your commit is 25 commits back in the 2nd branch of the merge
described by v3.11-rc1~16^2~103^2^2~5
git show v3.11-rc1~16^2~103^2^2~5
commit 76015021aaaa288bb4dc870258e0acc4d178c950
Merge: f7a01ca fded313
Author: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Mon Jun 10 14:51:17 2013 -0400
Merge branch 'for-john' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/iwlwifi/iwlwifi-next
which is by definition, 5 commits back from 2nd branch
of the merge v3.11-rc1~16^2~103^2
$ git show v3.11-rc1~16^2~103^2
commit 3899ba90a4ab2f3cab8e0f91a76c14ff131c8293
Merge: 45203a3 8b3e7be
Author: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Tue Jun 11 14:48:32 2013 -0400
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-next into for-davem
and that merge was merged into the merge v3.11-rc1~16^2~103
git show v3.11-rc1~16^2~103
commit 4a2e667ac15edd19b02321bc030acb3ebeb22ab6
Merge: 8f728d7 3899ba9
Author: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed Jun 12 14:23:41 2013 -0700
Merge branch 'for-davem' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-next
which means the above merge was 103 commits back from the last
(last = latest/newest) commit on the 2nd arm in merge v3.11-rc1~16
and so on.
All the data is there, regardless of whether a maintainer manually
manipulated the patch and added a SOB line or not.
Paul.
--
>
> Plus, of course, this assumes there's no fast-forward merges in the mix.
>
>>From your other message:
>
>> And what about trusting maintainers? If Linus trusts them enough to pull from
>> them, why can't everybody else trust them enough to assume that they don't do
>> bad things on purpose?
>
> I hope you're not reading such thoughts into what *I* wrote. But most
> anybody who works on code occasionally does bad things by mistake, that's
> why we have a review process.
>
> jon
> _______________________________________________
> Ksummit-2013-discuss mailing list
> Ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-2013-discuss
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-29 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20130729102452.GA2682@zurbaran>
[not found] ` <alpine.LNX.2.00.1307291230270.18809@pobox.suse.cz>
2013-07-29 13:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-29 14:11 ` Jonathan Corbet
2013-07-29 16:31 ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2013-07-29 16:33 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-07-29 22:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-01 10:16 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-08-01 17:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <20130729113526.GB3604@zurbaran>
[not found] ` <20130729130357.GQ29916@titan.lakedaemon.net>
2013-07-29 13:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-29 18:17 ` John W. Linville
2013-07-29 18:41 ` Jason Cooper
2013-07-29 22:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-31 5:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-31 5:56 ` James Bottomley
2013-07-31 11:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51F698DE.4010300@windriver.com \
--to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®