Re: [PATCH v1] dts: arm64: freescale: move imx9*-clock.h imx9*-power.h into dt-bindings

[Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@mailbox.org>]

On 9/1/25 5:33 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 01/09/2025 04:22, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 9/1/25 5:22 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 31, 2025 at 01:04:45PM -0700, E Shattow wrote:
>>>> Move imx9*-{clock,power}.h headers into
>>>> include/dt-bindings/{clock,power}/ and fix up the DTs
>>>
>>> No. The files should be under arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/
>> Why ? Linux already has include/dt-bindings/clock/ and
>> include/dt-bindings/power directories for exactly those headers , why
>> did iMX9 suddenly start conflating them into arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale ?
> 
> 
> Because maybe these are not bindings?

Please compare arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-clock.h and 
include/dt-bindings/clock/imx8mp-clock.h and clarify to me, why the 
imx95-clock.h is not bindings and the imx8mp-clock.h is bindings.

Both files list clock IDs for the clock nodes, one clock one is SCMI 
clock (iMX95), the other clock node is CCM clock (iMX8MP), and they are 
both (SCMI and CCM) clock nodes in DT. Both header files may have to be 
included in drivers, the iMX8MP headers already are, the iMX95 headers 
currently are included only in U-Boot drivers.

I really don't see the difference here, sorry.

> Regardless whether you agree or
> not, the commit should clearly explain the reason behind.
Which commit ?