Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] drm/msm/dpu: calculate DSC encoder parameters dynamically

[Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>]

On 29/04/2023 02:45, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
> During DSC preparation, add run time calculation to figure out what
> usage modes, split mode and merge mode, is going to be setup.

This patch doesn't determine the mode. It changes programming of DSC 
bits according to the mode being selected.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@quicinc.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++-------------
>   1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
> index 2fdacf1..3d18642 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
> @@ -529,17 +529,9 @@ void dpu_encoder_helper_split_config(
>   bool dpu_encoder_use_dsc_merge(struct drm_encoder *drm_enc)
>   {
>   	struct dpu_encoder_virt *dpu_enc = to_dpu_encoder_virt(drm_enc);
> -	int i, intf_count = 0, num_dsc = 0;
> +	struct msm_display_topology *topology = &dpu_enc->topology;
>   
> -	for (i = 0; i < MAX_PHYS_ENCODERS_PER_VIRTUAL; i++)
> -		if (dpu_enc->phys_encs[i])
> -			intf_count++;
> -
> -	/* See dpu_encoder_get_topology, we only support 2:2:1 topology */
> -	if (dpu_enc->dsc)
> -		num_dsc = 2;
> -
> -	return (num_dsc > 0) && (num_dsc > intf_count);
> +	return (topology->num_dsc > topology->num_intf);
>   }
>   
>   static void dpu_encoder_get_topology(
> @@ -1861,41 +1853,55 @@ static void dpu_encoder_prep_dsc(struct dpu_encoder_virt *dpu_enc,
>   	struct dpu_encoder_phys *enc_master = dpu_enc->cur_master;
>   	struct dpu_hw_dsc *hw_dsc[MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC];
>   	struct dpu_hw_pingpong *hw_pp[MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC];
> -	int this_frame_slices;
> +	struct msm_display_topology *topology = &dpu_enc->topology;
>   	int intf_ip_w, enc_ip_w;
> -	int dsc_common_mode;
> -	int pic_width;
> +	int dsc_common_mode = 0;

Please don't top-init variables unless required (or unless they are 
constant).

>   	u32 initial_lines;
> +	int num_dsc = topology->num_dsc;
> +	int num_intf = topology->num_intf;
>   	int i;
>   
> -	for (i = 0; i < MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_dsc; i++) {
>   		hw_pp[i] = dpu_enc->hw_pp[i];
>   		hw_dsc[i] = dpu_enc->hw_dsc[i];
>   
>   		if (!hw_pp[i] || !hw_dsc[i]) {
>   			DPU_ERROR_ENC(dpu_enc, "invalid params for DSC\n");
>   			return;
> -		}
> +		}

What is the difference here?

>   	}
>   
> -	dsc_common_mode = 0;
> -	pic_width = dsc->pic_width;
> +	intf_ip_w = dsc->pic_width;
>   
> -	dsc_common_mode = DSC_MODE_MULTIPLEX | DSC_MODE_SPLIT_PANEL;
>   	if (enc_master->intf_mode == INTF_MODE_VIDEO)
>   		dsc_common_mode |= DSC_MODE_VIDEO;
>   
> -	this_frame_slices = pic_width / dsc->slice_width;
> -	intf_ip_w = this_frame_slices * dsc->slice_width;
> -
>   	/*
> -	 * dsc merge case: when using 2 encoders for the same stream,
> -	 * no. of slices need to be same on both the encoders.
> +	 * If this encoder is driving more than one DSC encoder, they
> +	 * operate in tandem, same pic dimension needs to be used by
> +	 * each of them.(pp-split is assumed to be not supported)
> +	 *

Extra empty line. Also the comment doesn't make sense here anymore. We 
already have comment for the division by two below.

>   	 */
> -	enc_ip_w = intf_ip_w / 2;
> +	enc_ip_w = intf_ip_w;
> +
> +	intf_ip_w /= num_intf;
> +
> +	if (num_dsc > 1)
> +		dsc_common_mode |= DSC_MODE_SPLIT_PANEL;
> +
> +	if (dpu_encoder_use_dsc_merge(&dpu_enc->base)) {
> +		dsc_common_mode |= DSC_MODE_MULTIPLEX;
> +		/*
> +		 * in dsc merge case: when using 2 encoders for the same
> +		 * stream, no. of slices need to be same on both the
> +		 * encoders.
> +		 */
> +		enc_ip_w = intf_ip_w / 2;
> +	}
> +
>   	initial_lines = dpu_encoder_dsc_initial_line_calc(dsc, enc_ip_w);
>   
> -	for (i = 0; i < MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC; i++)
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_dsc; i++)
>   		dpu_encoder_dsc_pipe_cfg(dpu_enc, hw_dsc[i], hw_pp[i], dsc,
>   					dsc_common_mode, initial_lines);
>   }

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry