From: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
To: Mike Cui <cuicui@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.32 seemed to have broken nVidia MCP7A sata controller
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:36:43 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51f3faa71001211636s52a68af3u66f2832d81e7cbc0@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c8826911001211548l532a8f39y65b13b3ea4d0f93c@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Mike Cui <cuicui@gmail.com> wrote:
> I finally got a chance to try this on an x58 motherboard. It works
> fine. It looks like the nvidia controller is the problem. Or maybe
> it's just my motherboard.
I'll try and cook up a patch to disable AA on this chipset. Can you
post the output of "lspci -nn" ?
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Mike Cui <cuicui@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks, changing that one line fixed it. I can try to find an intel
>>> motherboard sometime next week to see if it's the drive or the
>>> controller.
>>
>> Hi Mike, did you ever get a chance to try this test?
>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 12/19/2009 01:29 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/19/2009 01:13 AM, Mike Cui wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have an nVidia MCP7A AHCI controller. I upgraded to 2.6.32.2 and my
>>>>>> system deterministically freezes trying to mount file systems. Once in
>>>>>> a while it will come back and finish booting after freezing for 1
>>>>>> minute or 2. dmesg indicates that there were NCQ errors, but 2.6.31
>>>>>> anb before has always worked flawlessly for me. What changed in
>>>>>> 2.6.32? I will be more than happy to help track down this issue.
>>>>>
>>>>>> ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
>>>>>> ata1.00: cmd 61/08:00:4f:ad:03/00:00:00:00:00/40 tag 0 ncq 4096 out
>>>>>> res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 (timeout)
>>>>>> ata1: hard resetting link
>>>>>> ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
>>>>>> ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
>>>>>> ata1.00: device reported invalid CHS sector 0
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks like things are timing out, and then go downhill from there. This
>>>>> explanation of timeout gives some hints on possible causes:
>>>>> http://ata.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Libata_error_messages#Error_classes
>>>>>
>>>>> The ideal would be if you could bisect between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32, to see
>>>>> if it's a software change that is the cause.
>>>>>
>>>>> Looking at drivers/ata/ahci.c history, the only thing that -might- cause
>>>>> problems is 388539f3ff0cf1de926b03f94e1eec112358f74d ('git show $commit'
>>>>> for full commit info and diff).
>>>>
>>>> I suspect that as well (it's the commit that adds FPDMA auto-activate on DMA
>>>> setup FIS support). Your drive indicates it's supported but it's possible
>>>> it's broken on that drive or the controller. If the drive doesn't set the
>>>> activate bit in the DMA setup FIS properly or the controller doesn't respect
>>>> it, then FPDMA requests will stall.
>>>>
>>>> Mike, can you try and revert that patch, or else just change this line in
>>>> drivers/ata/ahci.c:
>>>>
>>>> pi.flags |= ATA_FLAG_NCQ | ATA_FLAG_FPDMA_AA;
>>>>
>>>> to
>>>>
>>>> pi.flags |= ATA_FLAG_NCQ;
>>>>
>>>> and rebuild and see if it works better?
>>>>
>>>> I tend to suspect the controller is the problem (I've got WD drives that
>>>> work fine with AA on Intel AHCI, though it could be model-specific). I guess
>>>> the only way to verify for sure which one it is would be if someone else had
>>>> that particular drive model on a different AHCI controller and could verify
>>>> if it worked with 2.6.32+ or not.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-22 0:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <7c8826910912182213o2e0e8af7ic305f150c52e0618@mail.gmail.com>
2009-12-19 7:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-12-19 18:35 ` Robert Hancock
2009-12-19 22:37 ` Mike Cui
2009-12-19 22:55 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-12-27 21:52 ` Robert Hancock
2010-01-21 23:48 ` Mike Cui
2010-01-22 0:36 ` Robert Hancock [this message]
2010-01-26 9:43 ` Mike Cui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51f3faa71001211636s52a68af3u66f2832d81e7cbc0@mail.gmail.com \
--to=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
--cc=cuicui@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®