mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/11] tracing: add basic event trigger framework
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 17:30:06 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5203570E.3020201@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9660276cae921dfe8450cc259c99cd8b41ebb862.1375111640.git.tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>

(2013/07/30 1:40), Tom Zanussi wrote:
> +struct event_command {
> +	struct list_head	list;
> +	char			*name;
> +	enum trigger_mode	trigger_mode;
> +	bool			post_trigger;
> +	int			(*func)(struct event_command *cmd_ops,
> +					void *cmd_data,	char *glob, char *cmd,
> +					char *params, int enable);
> +	int			(*reg)(char *glob,
> +				       struct event_trigger_ops *trigger_ops,
> +				       void *trigger_data, void *cmd_data);
> +	void			(*unreg)(char *glob,
> +					 struct event_trigger_ops *trigger_ops,
> +					 void *trigger_data, void *cmd_data);
> +	int			(*set_filter)(char *filter_str,
> +					      void *trigger_data,
> +					      void *cmd_data);

I think you should pass trace_event_file *file (see below) instead of ambiguous
void *cmd_data, because all handler implementations expect that.


[...]
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/ctype.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +#include "trace.h"
> +
> +static LIST_HEAD(trigger_commands);
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(trigger_cmd_mutex);
> +
> +struct event_trigger_data {
> +	struct ftrace_event_file	*file;
> +	unsigned long			count;
> +	int				ref;
> +	bool				enable;
> +	struct event_trigger_ops	*ops;
> +	enum trigger_mode		mode;
> +	struct event_filter		*filter;
> +	char				*filter_str;
> +	struct list_head		list;
> +};
> +
> +struct trigger_iterator {
> +	struct ftrace_event_file	*file;
> +};

Why would you define this trigger_iterator even if it has
only one member? This means all iterators can be replaced
by the file. I'd like to keep it simple.

> +
> +void event_triggers_call(struct ftrace_event_file *file)
> +{
> +	struct event_trigger_data *data;
> +
> +	if (list_empty(&file->triggers))
> +		return;
> +
> +	preempt_disable_notrace();
> +	list_for_each_entry_rcu(data, &file->triggers, list)
> +		data->ops->func((void **)&data);
> +	preempt_enable_notrace();
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(event_triggers_call);
> +
> +static void *trigger_next(struct seq_file *m, void *t, loff_t *pos)
> +{
> +	struct trigger_iterator *iter = m->private;
> +
> +	return seq_list_next(t, &iter->file->triggers, pos);
> +}
> +
> +static void *trigger_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
> +{
> +	struct trigger_iterator *iter = m->private;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
> +
> +	return seq_list_start(&iter->file->triggers, *pos);
> +}

By Oleg's bugfixes, we are now using event_file_data(filp)
please refer the f_start/trace_format_open implementation
which is the closest usage of the trigger file.


> +static int event_trigger_regex_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> +{
> +	struct trigger_iterator *iter;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	iter = kzalloc(sizeof(*iter), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!iter)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
> +
> +	iter->file = inode->i_private;
> +
> +	if (file->f_mode & FMODE_READ) {
> +		ret = seq_open(file, &event_triggers_seq_ops);
> +		if (!ret) {
> +			struct seq_file *m = file->private_data;
> +			m->private = iter;
> +		} else {
> +			/* Failed */
> +			kfree(iter);
> +		}
> +	} else
> +		file->private_data = iter;
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}

As you can see in trace_format_open(), now file->private_data and
m->private will point struct file *, don't need to allocate something.

> +static ssize_t event_trigger_regex_write(struct file *file,
> +					 const char __user *ubuf,
> +					 size_t cnt, loff_t *ppos, int enable)
> +{
> +	struct trigger_iterator *iter = file->private_data;
> +	ssize_t ret;
> +	char *buf;
> +
> +	if (!cnt)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (cnt >= PAGE_SIZE)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (file->f_mode & FMODE_READ) {
> +		struct seq_file *m = file->private_data;
> +		iter = m->private;
> +	} else
> +		iter = file->private_data;
> +
> +	buf = (char *)__get_free_page(GFP_TEMPORARY);
> +	if (!buf)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	if (copy_from_user(buf, ubuf, cnt)) {
> +		free_page((unsigned long) buf);
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +	}
> +	buf[cnt] = '\0';
> +	strim(buf);
> +
> +	ret = trigger_process_regex(iter, buf, enable);

You also need to get event_mutex while processing event_file to
prevent unexpected releasing.

> +
> +	free_page((unsigned long) buf);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	*ppos += cnt;
> +	ret = cnt;
> + out:
> +	return ret;
> +}

Thank you,

-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com



  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-08  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-29 16:40 [PATCH v4 00/11] tracing: trace event triggers Tom Zanussi
2013-07-29 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] tracing: Add support for SOFT_DISABLE to syscall events Tom Zanussi
2013-08-05 11:42   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-29 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] tracing: add basic event trigger framework Tom Zanussi
2013-08-08  8:30   ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2013-08-22 19:54     ` Tom Zanussi
2013-07-29 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] tracing: add 'traceon' and 'traceoff' event trigger commands Tom Zanussi
2013-07-29 16:41 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] tracing: add 'snapshot' event trigger command Tom Zanussi
2013-07-29 16:41 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] tracing: add 'stacktrace' " Tom Zanussi
2013-07-29 16:41 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] tracing: add 'enable_event' and 'disable_event' event trigger commands Tom Zanussi
2013-08-08  5:54   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-29 16:41 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] tracing: add and use generic set_trigger_filter() implementation Tom Zanussi
2013-07-29 16:41 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] tracing: update event filters for multibuffer Tom Zanussi
2013-07-29 16:41 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] tracing: add documentation for trace event triggers Tom Zanussi
2013-07-29 16:41 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] tracing: make register/unregister_ftrace_command __init Tom Zanussi
2013-07-29 16:41 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] tracing: change event_trigger_open to verify i_private != NULL Tom Zanussi
2013-08-08  2:02 ` [PATCH v4 00/11] tracing: trace event triggers Masami Hiramatsu
2013-08-08  2:15   ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-22 19:48   ` Tom Zanussi
2013-08-22 23:26     ` Tom Zanussi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5203570E.3020201@hitachi.com \
    --to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome