From: Werner Sembach <wse@tuxedocomputers.com>
To: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>,
hansg@kernel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] platform/x86: uniwill-laptop: Add support for battery charge modes
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 18:53:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <520b2905-1120-4375-9333-05f0eb82fe19@tuxedocomputers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260406193653.7799-7-W_Armin@gmx.de>
Hi Armin,
Am 06.04.26 um 21:36 schrieb Armin Wolf:
> Many Uniwill-based devices do not supports the already existing
> charge limit functionality, but instead support an alternative
> interface for controlling the battery charge algorithm.
>
> Add support for this interface and update the documentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
> ---
> .../admin-guide/laptops/uniwill-laptop.rst | 25 +-
> drivers/platform/x86/uniwill/uniwill-acpi.c | 244 ++++++++++++++----
> drivers/platform/x86/uniwill/uniwill-wmi.c | 5 +-
> 3 files changed, 226 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/laptops/uniwill-laptop.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/laptops/uniwill-laptop.rst
> index 561334865feb..24b41dbab886 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/laptops/uniwill-laptop.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/laptops/uniwill-laptop.rst
> @@ -43,9 +43,23 @@ Support for changing the platform performance mode is currently not implemented.
> Battery Charging Control
> ------------------------
>
> -The ``uniwill-laptop`` driver supports controlling the battery charge limit. This happens over
> -the standard ``charge_control_end_threshold`` power supply sysfs attribute. All values
> -between 1 and 100 percent are supported.
> +.. warning:: Some devices do not properly implement the charging threshold interface. Forcing
> + the driver to enable access to said interface on such devices might damage the
> + battery [1]_. Because of this the driver will not enable said feature even when
> + using the ``force`` module parameter. The charging profile interface will be
> + available instead.
> +
> +The ``uniwill-laptop`` driver supports controlling the battery charge limit. This either happens
> +over the standard ``charge_control_end_threshold`` or ``charge_types`` power supply sysfs attribute,
> +depending on the device. When using the ``charge_control_end_threshold`` sysfs attribute, all values
> +between 1 and 100 percent are supported. When using the ``charge_types`` sysfs attribute, the driver
> +supports switching between the ``Standard``, ``Trickle`` and ``Long Life`` profiles.
> +
> +Keep in mind that when using the ``charge_types`` sysfs attribute, the EC firmware will hide the
> +true charging status of the battery from the operating system, potentially misleading users into
> +thinking that the charging profile does not work. Checking the ``current_now`` sysfs attribute
> +tells you the true charging status of the battery even when using the ``charge_types`` sysfs
> +attribute (0 means that the battery is currently not charging).
>
> Additionally the driver signals the presence of battery charging issues through the standard
> ``health`` power supply sysfs attribute.
> @@ -70,3 +84,8 @@ The ``uniwill-laptop`` driver allows to set the configurable TGP for devices wit
> allow it.
>
> See Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-uniwill-laptop for details.
> +
> +References
> +==========
> +
> +.. [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/XMG_gg/comments/ld9yyf/battery_limit_hidden_function_discovered_on/
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/uniwill/uniwill-acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/uniwill/uniwill-acpi.c
> index a116e2ec6453..fbf2e101a074 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/uniwill/uniwill-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/uniwill/uniwill-acpi.c
> @@ -254,6 +254,10 @@
>
> #define EC_ADDR_OEM_4 0x07A6
> #define OVERBOOST_DYN_TEMP_OFF BIT(1)
> +#define CHARGING_PROFILE_MASK GENMASK(5, 4)
> +#define CHARGING_PROFILE_HIGH_CAPACITY 0x00
> +#define CHARGING_PROFILE_BALANCED 0x01
> +#define CHARGING_PROFILE_STATIONARY 0x02
> #define TOUCHPAD_TOGGLE_OFF BIT(6)
>
> #define EC_ADDR_CHARGE_CTRL 0x07B9
> @@ -320,13 +324,15 @@
> #define UNIWILL_FEATURE_SUPER_KEY BIT(1)
> #define UNIWILL_FEATURE_TOUCHPAD_TOGGLE BIT(2)
> #define UNIWILL_FEATURE_LIGHTBAR BIT(3)
> -#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY BIT(4)
> -#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_CPU_TEMP BIT(5)
> -#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_GPU_TEMP BIT(6)
> -#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_PRIMARY_FAN BIT(7)
> -#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_SECONDARY_FAN BIT(8)
> -#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_NVIDIA_CTGP_CONTROL BIT(9)
> -#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_USB_C_POWER_PRIORITY BIT(10)
> +#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_LIMIT BIT(4)
> +/* Mutually exclusive with the charge limit feature */
> +#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_MODES BIT(5)
> +#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_CPU_TEMP BIT(6)
> +#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_GPU_TEMP BIT(7)
> +#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_PRIMARY_FAN BIT(8)
> +#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_SECONDARY_FAN BIT(9)
> +#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_NVIDIA_CTGP_CONTROL BIT(10)
> +#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_USB_C_POWER_PRIORITY BIT(11)
>
> enum usb_c_power_priority_options {
> USB_C_POWER_PRIORITY_CHARGING = 0,
> @@ -339,8 +345,15 @@ struct uniwill_data {
> struct regmap *regmap;
> unsigned int features;
> struct acpi_battery_hook hook;
> - unsigned int last_charge_ctrl;
> struct mutex battery_lock; /* Protects the list of currently registered batteries */
> + union {
> + struct {
> + /* Protects writes to last_charge_type */
> + struct mutex charge_type_lock;
> + enum power_supply_charge_type last_charge_type;
> + };
> + unsigned int last_charge_ctrl;
> + };
> bool last_fn_lock_state;
> bool last_super_key_enable_state;
> bool last_touchpad_toggle_enable_state;
> @@ -447,6 +460,12 @@ static inline bool uniwill_device_supports(const struct uniwill_data *data,
> return (data->features & features) == features;
> }
>
> +static inline bool uniwill_device_supports_any(const struct uniwill_data *data,
> + unsigned int features)
> +{
> + return data->features & features;
> +}
> +
Maybe add a "!= 0" to make the return a clear 1 or 0
> static int uniwill_ec_reg_write(void *context, unsigned int reg, unsigned int val)
> {
> union acpi_object params[2] = {
> @@ -1421,6 +1440,30 @@ static int uniwill_led_init(struct uniwill_data *data)
> &init_data);
> }
>
> +static int uniwill_read_charge_type(struct uniwill_data *data, enum power_supply_charge_type *type)
> +{
> + unsigned int value;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, EC_ADDR_OEM_4, &value);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + switch (FIELD_GET(CHARGING_PROFILE_MASK, value)) {
> + case CHARGING_PROFILE_HIGH_CAPACITY:
> + *type = POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_STANDARD;
> + return 0;
> + case CHARGING_PROFILE_BALANCED:
> + *type = POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_LONGLIFE;
> + return 0;
> + case CHARGING_PROFILE_STATIONARY:
> + *type = POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_TRICKLE;
> + return 0;
> + default:
> + return -EPROTO;
> + }
> +}
Like I wrote here:
https://github.com/Wer-Wolf/uniwill-laptop/issues/6#issuecomment-3987100594 I
think it would be less confusing to use
POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_TRICKLE -> CHARGING_PROFILE_STATIONARY
POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_STANDARD -> CHARGING_PROFILE_BALANCED
POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_FAST -> CHARGING_PROFILE_HIGH_CAPACITY
because then the charge speed is at least clearly communicated
POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_FAST would then be the default
> +
> static int uniwill_get_property(struct power_supply *psy, const struct power_supply_ext *ext,
> void *drvdata, enum power_supply_property psp,
> union power_supply_propval *val)
> @@ -1431,6 +1474,16 @@ static int uniwill_get_property(struct power_supply *psy, const struct power_sup
> int ret;
>
> switch (psp) {
> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_TYPES:
> + /*
> + * We need to use the cached value here because the charging mode
> + * reported by the EC might temporarily change when a external power
> + * source has been connected.
> + */
> + mutex_lock(&data->charge_type_lock);
> + val->intval = data->last_charge_type;
> + mutex_unlock(&data->charge_type_lock);
> + return 0;
> case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_HEALTH:
> ret = power_supply_get_property_direct(psy, POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_PRESENT, &prop);
> if (ret < 0)
> @@ -1479,13 +1532,52 @@ static int uniwill_get_property(struct power_supply *psy, const struct power_sup
> }
> }
>
> +static int uniwill_write_charge_type(struct uniwill_data *data, enum power_supply_charge_type type)
> +{
> + unsigned int value;
> +
> + switch (type) {
> + case POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_TRICKLE:
> + value = FIELD_PREP(CHARGING_PROFILE_MASK, CHARGING_PROFILE_STATIONARY);
> + break;
> + case POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_STANDARD:
> + value = FIELD_PREP(CHARGING_PROFILE_MASK, CHARGING_PROFILE_HIGH_CAPACITY);
> + break;
> + case POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_LONGLIFE:
> + value = FIELD_PREP(CHARGING_PROFILE_MASK, CHARGING_PROFILE_BALANCED);
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, EC_ADDR_OEM_4, CHARGING_PROFILE_MASK, value);
> +}
> +
> +static int uniwill_restore_charge_type(struct uniwill_data *data)
> +{
> + guard(mutex)(&data->charge_type_lock);
> +
> + return uniwill_write_charge_type(data, data->last_charge_type);
> +}
> +
> static int uniwill_set_property(struct power_supply *psy, const struct power_supply_ext *ext,
> void *drvdata, enum power_supply_property psp,
> const union power_supply_propval *val)
> {
> struct uniwill_data *data = drvdata;
> + int ret;
>
> switch (psp) {
> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_TYPES:
> + mutex_lock(&data->charge_type_lock);
> +
> + ret = uniwill_write_charge_type(data, val->intval);
> + if (ret >= 0)
> + data->last_charge_type = val->intval;
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&data->charge_type_lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_CONTROL_END_THRESHOLD:
> if (val->intval < 0 || val->intval > 100)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -1501,21 +1593,41 @@ static int uniwill_property_is_writeable(struct power_supply *psy,
> const struct power_supply_ext *ext, void *drvdata,
> enum power_supply_property psp)
> {
> - if (psp == POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_CONTROL_END_THRESHOLD)
> + switch (psp) {
> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_TYPES:
> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_CONTROL_END_THRESHOLD:
> return true;
> -
> - return false;
> + default:
> + return false;
> + }
> }
Could be mistaken, but does this work without producing a compiler warning or
error not having a return on the top level?
>
> -static const enum power_supply_property uniwill_properties[] = {
> +static const enum power_supply_property uniwill_charge_limit_properties[] = {
> POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_HEALTH,
> POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_CONTROL_END_THRESHOLD,
> };
>
> -static const struct power_supply_ext uniwill_extension = {
> +static const struct power_supply_ext uniwill_charge_limit_extension = {
> + .name = DRIVER_NAME,
> + .properties = uniwill_charge_limit_properties,
> + .num_properties = ARRAY_SIZE(uniwill_charge_limit_properties),
> + .get_property = uniwill_get_property,
> + .set_property = uniwill_set_property,
> + .property_is_writeable = uniwill_property_is_writeable,
> +};
> +
> +static const enum power_supply_property uniwill_charge_modes_properties[] = {
> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_TYPES,
> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_HEALTH,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct power_supply_ext uniwill_charge_modes_extension = {
> .name = DRIVER_NAME,
> - .properties = uniwill_properties,
> - .num_properties = ARRAY_SIZE(uniwill_properties),
> + .charge_types = BIT(POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_TRICKLE) |
> + BIT(POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_STANDARD) |
> + BIT(POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_LONGLIFE),
> + .properties = uniwill_charge_modes_properties,
> + .num_properties = ARRAY_SIZE(uniwill_charge_modes_properties),
> .get_property = uniwill_get_property,
> .set_property = uniwill_set_property,
> .property_is_writeable = uniwill_property_is_writeable,
> @@ -1531,7 +1643,13 @@ static int uniwill_add_battery(struct power_supply *battery, struct acpi_battery
> if (!entry)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - ret = power_supply_register_extension(battery, &uniwill_extension, data->dev, data);
> + if (uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_LIMIT))
> + ret = power_supply_register_extension(battery, &uniwill_charge_limit_extension,
> + data->dev, data);
> + else
> + ret = power_supply_register_extension(battery, &uniwill_charge_modes_extension,
> + data->dev, data);
> +
Currently there is now way to specify just the health parameter, but i have to
check if that is even required
> if (ret < 0) {
> kfree(entry);
> return ret;
> @@ -1560,7 +1678,10 @@ static int uniwill_remove_battery(struct power_supply *battery, struct acpi_batt
> }
> }
>
> - power_supply_unregister_extension(battery, &uniwill_extension);
> + if (uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_LIMIT))
> + power_supply_unregister_extension(battery, &uniwill_charge_limit_extension);
> + else
> + power_supply_unregister_extension(battery, &uniwill_charge_modes_extension);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1570,25 +1691,35 @@ static int uniwill_battery_init(struct uniwill_data *data)
> unsigned int value, threshold;
> int ret;
>
> - if (!uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY))
> - return 0;
> + if (uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_LIMIT)) {
> + ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, EC_ADDR_CHARGE_CTRL, &value);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
>
> - ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, EC_ADDR_CHARGE_CTRL, &value);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + /*
> + * The charge control threshold might be initialized with 0 by
> + * the EC to signal that said threshold is uninitialized. We thus
> + * need to replace this value with 100 to signal that we want to
> + * take control of battery charging. For the sake of completeness
> + * we also set the charging threshold to 100 if the EC-provided
> + * value is invalid.
> + */
> + threshold = FIELD_GET(CHARGE_CTRL_MASK, value);
> + if (threshold == 0 || threshold > 100) {
> + FIELD_MODIFY(CHARGE_CTRL_MASK, &value, 100);
> + ret = regmap_write(data->regmap, EC_ADDR_CHARGE_CTRL, value);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + }
> + } else {
> + if (!uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_MODES))
> + return 0;
Would use an "else if (uniwill_device_supports(data,
UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_MODES))" and put the return 0 at the end of the
function.
>
> - /*
> - * The charge control threshold might be initialized with 0 by
> - * the EC to signal that said threshold is uninitialized. We thus
> - * need to replace this value with 100 to signal that we want to
> - * take control of battery charging. For the sake of completeness
> - * we also set the charging threshold to 100 if the EC-provided
> - * value is invalid.
> - */
> - threshold = FIELD_GET(CHARGE_CTRL_MASK, value);
> - if (threshold == 0 || threshold > 100) {
> - FIELD_MODIFY(CHARGE_CTRL_MASK, &value, 100);
> - ret = regmap_write(data->regmap, EC_ADDR_CHARGE_CTRL, value);
> + ret = devm_mutex_init(data->dev, &data->charge_type_lock);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = uniwill_read_charge_type(data, &data->last_charge_type);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -1609,10 +1740,13 @@ static int uniwill_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action
> {
> struct uniwill_data *data = container_of(nb, struct uniwill_data, nb);
> struct uniwill_battery_entry *entry;
> + int ret;
>
> switch (action) {
> case UNIWILL_OSD_BATTERY_ALERT:
> - if (!uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY))
> + if (!uniwill_device_supports_any(data,
> + UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_LIMIT |
> + UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_MODES))
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
>
> mutex_lock(&data->battery_lock);
> @@ -1623,10 +1757,24 @@ static int uniwill_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action
>
> return NOTIFY_OK;
> case UNIWILL_OSD_DC_ADAPTER_CHANGED:
> - if (!uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_USB_C_POWER_PRIORITY))
> + if (!uniwill_device_supports_any(data,
> + UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_MODES |
> + UNIWILL_FEATURE_USB_C_POWER_PRIORITY))
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
>
> - return notifier_from_errno(usb_c_power_priority_restore(data));
> + if (uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_MODES)) {
> + ret = uniwill_restore_charge_type(data);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return notifier_from_errno(ret);
> + }
> +
> + if (uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_USB_C_POWER_PRIORITY)) {
> + ret = usb_c_power_priority_restore(data);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return notifier_from_errno(ret);
> + }
> +
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> case UNIWILL_OSD_FN_LOCK:
> if (!uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_FN_LOCK))
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
> @@ -1810,7 +1958,7 @@ static int uniwill_suspend_touchpad_toggle(struct uniwill_data *data)
>
> static int uniwill_suspend_battery(struct uniwill_data *data)
> {
> - if (!uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY))
> + if (!uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_LIMIT))
> return 0;
>
> /*
> @@ -1887,7 +2035,15 @@ static int uniwill_resume_touchpad_toggle(struct uniwill_data *data)
>
> static int uniwill_resume_battery(struct uniwill_data *data)
> {
> - if (!uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY))
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_MODES)) {
> + ret = uniwill_restore_charge_type(data);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (!uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_LIMIT))
> return 0;
>
> return regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, EC_ADDR_CHARGE_CTRL, CHARGE_CTRL_MASK,
> @@ -1970,7 +2126,7 @@ static struct platform_driver uniwill_driver = {
>
> static struct uniwill_device_descriptor lapqc71a_lapqc71b_descriptor __initdata = {
> .features = UNIWILL_FEATURE_SUPER_KEY |
> - UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY |
> + UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_LIMIT |
> UNIWILL_FEATURE_CPU_TEMP |
> UNIWILL_FEATURE_GPU_TEMP |
> UNIWILL_FEATURE_PRIMARY_FAN |
> @@ -1981,7 +2137,7 @@ static struct uniwill_device_descriptor lapac71h_descriptor __initdata = {
> .features = UNIWILL_FEATURE_FN_LOCK |
> UNIWILL_FEATURE_SUPER_KEY |
> UNIWILL_FEATURE_TOUCHPAD_TOGGLE |
> - UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY |
> + UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_LIMIT |
> UNIWILL_FEATURE_CPU_TEMP |
> UNIWILL_FEATURE_GPU_TEMP |
> UNIWILL_FEATURE_PRIMARY_FAN |
> @@ -1993,7 +2149,7 @@ static struct uniwill_device_descriptor lapkc71f_descriptor __initdata = {
> UNIWILL_FEATURE_SUPER_KEY |
> UNIWILL_FEATURE_TOUCHPAD_TOGGLE |
> UNIWILL_FEATURE_LIGHTBAR |
> - UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY |
> + UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_LIMIT |
> UNIWILL_FEATURE_CPU_TEMP |
> UNIWILL_FEATURE_GPU_TEMP |
> UNIWILL_FEATURE_PRIMARY_FAN |
Maybe we should put in some assertion to ensure that
UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_LIMIT and UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_MODES
are not set at the same time, or it that being to wary?
> @@ -2578,8 +2734,8 @@ static int __init uniwill_init(void)
> }
>
> if (force) {
> - /* Assume that the device supports all features */
> - device_descriptor.features = UINT_MAX;
> + /* Assume that the device supports all features except the charge limit */
> + device_descriptor.features = UINT_MAX & ~UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_LIMIT;
> pr_warn("Enabling potentially unsupported features\n");
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/uniwill/uniwill-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/uniwill/uniwill-wmi.c
> index 31d9c39f14ab..f1b89bc63df6 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/uniwill/uniwill-wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/uniwill/uniwill-wmi.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ int devm_uniwill_wmi_register_notifier(struct device *dev, struct notifier_block
> static void uniwill_wmi_notify(struct wmi_device *wdev, union acpi_object *obj)
> {
> u32 value;
> + int ret;
>
> if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER)
> return;
> @@ -56,7 +57,9 @@ static void uniwill_wmi_notify(struct wmi_device *wdev, union acpi_object *obj)
>
> dev_dbg(&wdev->dev, "Received WMI event %u\n", value);
>
> - blocking_notifier_call_chain(&uniwill_wmi_chain_head, value, NULL);
> + ret = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&uniwill_wmi_chain_head, value, NULL);
> + if (notifier_to_errno(ret) < 0)
> + dev_err(&wdev->dev, "Failed to handle event %u\n", value);
> }
>
> /*
Is this something specific for this patch or just general cleanup that sneaked
into here?
Best regards,
Werner
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-10 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-06 19:36 [PATCH 0/6] platform/x86: uniwill-laptop: Charging-related improvements Armin Wolf
2026-04-06 19:36 ` [PATCH 1/6] platform/x86: uniwill-laptop: Properly initialize charging threshold Armin Wolf
2026-04-08 22:59 ` Werner Sembach
2026-04-10 17:27 ` Armin Wolf
2026-04-10 20:26 ` Werner Sembach
2026-04-06 19:36 ` [PATCH 2/6] platform/x86: uniwill-laptop: Accept charging threshold of 0 Armin Wolf
2026-04-08 23:01 ` Werner Sembach
2026-04-06 19:36 ` [PATCH 3/6] platform/x86: uniwill-laptop: Fix behavior of "force" module param Armin Wolf
2026-04-08 23:08 ` Werner Sembach
2026-04-10 17:32 ` Armin Wolf
2026-04-10 20:30 ` Werner Sembach
2026-04-10 21:45 ` Armin Wolf
2026-04-06 19:36 ` [PATCH 4/6] platform/x86: uniwill-laptop: Rework FN lock/super key suspend handling Armin Wolf
2026-04-10 15:30 ` Werner Sembach
2026-04-10 17:33 ` Armin Wolf
2026-04-06 19:36 ` [PATCH 5/6] platform/x86: uniwill-laptop: Mark EC_ADDR_OEM_4 as volatile Armin Wolf
2026-04-10 15:35 ` Werner Sembach
2026-04-06 19:36 ` [PATCH 6/6] platform/x86: uniwill-laptop: Add support for battery charge modes Armin Wolf
2026-04-10 16:53 ` Werner Sembach [this message]
2026-04-10 17:53 ` Armin Wolf
2026-04-10 20:24 ` Werner Sembach
2026-04-10 21:47 ` Armin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=520b2905-1120-4375-9333-05f0eb82fe19@tuxedocomputers.com \
--to=wse@tuxedocomputers.com \
--cc=W_Armin@gmx.de \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®