mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Werner Sembach <wse@tuxedocomputers.com>
To: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>,
	hansg@kernel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] platform/x86: uniwill-laptop: Add support for battery charge modes
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 18:53:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <520b2905-1120-4375-9333-05f0eb82fe19@tuxedocomputers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260406193653.7799-7-W_Armin@gmx.de>

Hi Armin,

Am 06.04.26 um 21:36 schrieb Armin Wolf:
> Many Uniwill-based devices do not supports the already existing
> charge limit functionality, but instead support an alternative
> interface for controlling the battery charge algorithm.
>
> Add support for this interface and update the documentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
> ---
>   .../admin-guide/laptops/uniwill-laptop.rst    |  25 +-
>   drivers/platform/x86/uniwill/uniwill-acpi.c   | 244 ++++++++++++++----
>   drivers/platform/x86/uniwill/uniwill-wmi.c    |   5 +-
>   3 files changed, 226 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/laptops/uniwill-laptop.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/laptops/uniwill-laptop.rst
> index 561334865feb..24b41dbab886 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/laptops/uniwill-laptop.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/laptops/uniwill-laptop.rst
> @@ -43,9 +43,23 @@ Support for changing the platform performance mode is currently not implemented.
>   Battery Charging Control
>   ------------------------
>   
> -The ``uniwill-laptop`` driver supports controlling the battery charge limit. This happens over
> -the standard ``charge_control_end_threshold`` power supply sysfs attribute. All values
> -between 1 and 100 percent are supported.
> +.. warning:: Some devices do not properly implement the charging threshold interface. Forcing
> +             the driver to enable access to said interface on such devices might damage the
> +             battery [1]_. Because of this the driver will not enable said feature even when
> +             using the ``force`` module parameter. The charging profile interface will be
> +             available instead.
> +
> +The ``uniwill-laptop`` driver supports controlling the battery charge limit. This either happens
> +over the standard ``charge_control_end_threshold`` or ``charge_types`` power supply sysfs attribute,
> +depending on the device. When using the ``charge_control_end_threshold`` sysfs attribute, all values
> +between 1 and 100 percent are supported. When using the ``charge_types`` sysfs attribute, the driver
> +supports switching between the ``Standard``, ``Trickle`` and ``Long Life`` profiles.
> +
> +Keep in mind that when using the ``charge_types`` sysfs attribute, the EC firmware will hide the
> +true charging status of the battery from the operating system, potentially misleading users into
> +thinking that the charging profile does not work. Checking the ``current_now`` sysfs attribute
> +tells you the true charging status of the battery even when using the ``charge_types`` sysfs
> +attribute (0 means that the battery is currently not charging).
>   
>   Additionally the driver signals the presence of battery charging issues through the standard
>   ``health`` power supply sysfs attribute.
> @@ -70,3 +84,8 @@ The ``uniwill-laptop`` driver allows to set the configurable TGP for devices wit
>   allow it.
>   
>   See Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-uniwill-laptop for details.
> +
> +References
> +==========
> +
> +.. [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/XMG_gg/comments/ld9yyf/battery_limit_hidden_function_discovered_on/
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/uniwill/uniwill-acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/uniwill/uniwill-acpi.c
> index a116e2ec6453..fbf2e101a074 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/uniwill/uniwill-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/uniwill/uniwill-acpi.c
> @@ -254,6 +254,10 @@
>   
>   #define EC_ADDR_OEM_4			0x07A6
>   #define OVERBOOST_DYN_TEMP_OFF		BIT(1)
> +#define CHARGING_PROFILE_MASK		GENMASK(5, 4)
> +#define CHARGING_PROFILE_HIGH_CAPACITY	0x00
> +#define CHARGING_PROFILE_BALANCED	0x01
> +#define CHARGING_PROFILE_STATIONARY	0x02
>   #define TOUCHPAD_TOGGLE_OFF		BIT(6)
>   
>   #define EC_ADDR_CHARGE_CTRL		0x07B9
> @@ -320,13 +324,15 @@
>   #define UNIWILL_FEATURE_SUPER_KEY		BIT(1)
>   #define UNIWILL_FEATURE_TOUCHPAD_TOGGLE		BIT(2)
>   #define UNIWILL_FEATURE_LIGHTBAR		BIT(3)
> -#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY			BIT(4)
> -#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_CPU_TEMP		BIT(5)
> -#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_GPU_TEMP		BIT(6)
> -#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_PRIMARY_FAN		BIT(7)
> -#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_SECONDARY_FAN		BIT(8)
> -#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_NVIDIA_CTGP_CONTROL	BIT(9)
> -#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_USB_C_POWER_PRIORITY	BIT(10)
> +#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_LIMIT	BIT(4)
> +/* Mutually exclusive with the charge limit feature */
> +#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_MODES	BIT(5)
> +#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_CPU_TEMP		BIT(6)
> +#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_GPU_TEMP		BIT(7)
> +#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_PRIMARY_FAN		BIT(8)
> +#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_SECONDARY_FAN		BIT(9)
> +#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_NVIDIA_CTGP_CONTROL	BIT(10)
> +#define UNIWILL_FEATURE_USB_C_POWER_PRIORITY	BIT(11)
>   
>   enum usb_c_power_priority_options {
>   	USB_C_POWER_PRIORITY_CHARGING = 0,
> @@ -339,8 +345,15 @@ struct uniwill_data {
>   	struct regmap *regmap;
>   	unsigned int features;
>   	struct acpi_battery_hook hook;
> -	unsigned int last_charge_ctrl;
>   	struct mutex battery_lock;	/* Protects the list of currently registered batteries */
> +	union {
> +		struct {
> +			/* Protects writes to last_charge_type */
> +			struct mutex charge_type_lock;
> +			enum power_supply_charge_type last_charge_type;
> +		};
> +		unsigned int last_charge_ctrl;
> +	};
>   	bool last_fn_lock_state;
>   	bool last_super_key_enable_state;
>   	bool last_touchpad_toggle_enable_state;
> @@ -447,6 +460,12 @@ static inline bool uniwill_device_supports(const struct uniwill_data *data,
>   	return (data->features & features) == features;
>   }
>   
> +static inline bool uniwill_device_supports_any(const struct uniwill_data *data,
> +					       unsigned int features)
> +{
> +	return data->features & features;
> +}
> +
Maybe add a "!= 0" to make the return a clear 1 or 0
>   static int uniwill_ec_reg_write(void *context, unsigned int reg, unsigned int val)
>   {
>   	union acpi_object params[2] = {
> @@ -1421,6 +1440,30 @@ static int uniwill_led_init(struct uniwill_data *data)
>   							 &init_data);
>   }
>   
> +static int uniwill_read_charge_type(struct uniwill_data *data, enum power_supply_charge_type *type)
> +{
> +	unsigned int value;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, EC_ADDR_OEM_4, &value);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	switch (FIELD_GET(CHARGING_PROFILE_MASK, value)) {
> +	case CHARGING_PROFILE_HIGH_CAPACITY:
> +		*type = POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_STANDARD;
> +		return 0;
> +	case CHARGING_PROFILE_BALANCED:
> +		*type = POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_LONGLIFE;
> +		return 0;
> +	case CHARGING_PROFILE_STATIONARY:
> +		*type = POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_TRICKLE;
> +		return 0;
> +	default:
> +		return -EPROTO;
> +	}
> +}
Like I wrote here: 
https://github.com/Wer-Wolf/uniwill-laptop/issues/6#issuecomment-3987100594 I 
think it would be less confusing to use

POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_TRICKLE -> CHARGING_PROFILE_STATIONARY

POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_STANDARD -> CHARGING_PROFILE_BALANCED

POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_FAST -> CHARGING_PROFILE_HIGH_CAPACITY

because then the charge speed is at least clearly communicated

POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_FAST would then be the default

> +
>   static int uniwill_get_property(struct power_supply *psy, const struct power_supply_ext *ext,
>   				void *drvdata, enum power_supply_property psp,
>   				union power_supply_propval *val)
> @@ -1431,6 +1474,16 @@ static int uniwill_get_property(struct power_supply *psy, const struct power_sup
>   	int ret;
>   
>   	switch (psp) {
> +	case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_TYPES:
> +		/*
> +		 * We need to use the cached value here because the charging mode
> +		 * reported by the EC might temporarily change when a external power
> +		 * source has been connected.
> +		 */
> +		mutex_lock(&data->charge_type_lock);
> +		val->intval = data->last_charge_type;
> +		mutex_unlock(&data->charge_type_lock);
> +		return 0;
>   	case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_HEALTH:
>   		ret = power_supply_get_property_direct(psy, POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_PRESENT, &prop);
>   		if (ret < 0)
> @@ -1479,13 +1532,52 @@ static int uniwill_get_property(struct power_supply *psy, const struct power_sup
>   	}
>   }
>   
> +static int uniwill_write_charge_type(struct uniwill_data *data, enum power_supply_charge_type type)
> +{
> +	unsigned int value;
> +
> +	switch (type) {
> +	case POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_TRICKLE:
> +		value = FIELD_PREP(CHARGING_PROFILE_MASK, CHARGING_PROFILE_STATIONARY);
> +		break;
> +	case POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_STANDARD:
> +		value = FIELD_PREP(CHARGING_PROFILE_MASK, CHARGING_PROFILE_HIGH_CAPACITY);
> +		break;
> +	case POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_LONGLIFE:
> +		value = FIELD_PREP(CHARGING_PROFILE_MASK, CHARGING_PROFILE_BALANCED);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	return regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, EC_ADDR_OEM_4, CHARGING_PROFILE_MASK, value);
> +}
> +
> +static int uniwill_restore_charge_type(struct uniwill_data *data)
> +{
> +	guard(mutex)(&data->charge_type_lock);
> +
> +	return uniwill_write_charge_type(data, data->last_charge_type);
> +}
> +
>   static int uniwill_set_property(struct power_supply *psy, const struct power_supply_ext *ext,
>   				void *drvdata, enum power_supply_property psp,
>   				const union power_supply_propval *val)
>   {
>   	struct uniwill_data *data = drvdata;
> +	int ret;
>   
>   	switch (psp) {
> +	case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_TYPES:
> +		mutex_lock(&data->charge_type_lock);
> +
> +		ret = uniwill_write_charge_type(data, val->intval);
> +		if (ret >= 0)
> +			data->last_charge_type = val->intval;
> +
> +		mutex_unlock(&data->charge_type_lock);
> +
> +		return ret;
>   	case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_CONTROL_END_THRESHOLD:
>   		if (val->intval < 0 || val->intval > 100)
>   			return -EINVAL;
> @@ -1501,21 +1593,41 @@ static int uniwill_property_is_writeable(struct power_supply *psy,
>   					 const struct power_supply_ext *ext, void *drvdata,
>   					 enum power_supply_property psp)
>   {
> -	if (psp == POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_CONTROL_END_THRESHOLD)
> +	switch (psp) {
> +	case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_TYPES:
> +	case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_CONTROL_END_THRESHOLD:
>   		return true;
> -
> -	return false;
> +	default:
> +		return false;
> +	}
>   }
Could be mistaken, but does this work without producing a compiler warning or 
error not having a return on the top level?
>   
> -static const enum power_supply_property uniwill_properties[] = {
> +static const enum power_supply_property uniwill_charge_limit_properties[] = {
>   	POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_HEALTH,
>   	POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_CONTROL_END_THRESHOLD,
>   };
>   
> -static const struct power_supply_ext uniwill_extension = {
> +static const struct power_supply_ext uniwill_charge_limit_extension = {
> +	.name = DRIVER_NAME,
> +	.properties = uniwill_charge_limit_properties,
> +	.num_properties = ARRAY_SIZE(uniwill_charge_limit_properties),
> +	.get_property = uniwill_get_property,
> +	.set_property = uniwill_set_property,
> +	.property_is_writeable = uniwill_property_is_writeable,
> +};
> +
> +static const enum power_supply_property uniwill_charge_modes_properties[] = {
> +	POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_TYPES,
> +	POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_HEALTH,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct power_supply_ext uniwill_charge_modes_extension = {
>   	.name = DRIVER_NAME,
> -	.properties = uniwill_properties,
> -	.num_properties = ARRAY_SIZE(uniwill_properties),
> +	.charge_types = BIT(POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_TRICKLE) |
> +			BIT(POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_STANDARD) |
> +			BIT(POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_LONGLIFE),
> +	.properties = uniwill_charge_modes_properties,
> +	.num_properties = ARRAY_SIZE(uniwill_charge_modes_properties),
>   	.get_property = uniwill_get_property,
>   	.set_property = uniwill_set_property,
>   	.property_is_writeable = uniwill_property_is_writeable,
> @@ -1531,7 +1643,13 @@ static int uniwill_add_battery(struct power_supply *battery, struct acpi_battery
>   	if (!entry)
>   		return -ENOMEM;
>   
> -	ret = power_supply_register_extension(battery, &uniwill_extension, data->dev, data);
> +	if (uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_LIMIT))
> +		ret = power_supply_register_extension(battery, &uniwill_charge_limit_extension,
> +						      data->dev, data);
> +	else
> +		ret = power_supply_register_extension(battery, &uniwill_charge_modes_extension,
> +						      data->dev, data);
> +
Currently there is now way to specify just the health parameter, but i have to 
check if that is even required
>   	if (ret < 0) {
>   		kfree(entry);
>   		return ret;
> @@ -1560,7 +1678,10 @@ static int uniwill_remove_battery(struct power_supply *battery, struct acpi_batt
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> -	power_supply_unregister_extension(battery, &uniwill_extension);
> +	if (uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_LIMIT))
> +		power_supply_unregister_extension(battery, &uniwill_charge_limit_extension);
> +	else
> +		power_supply_unregister_extension(battery, &uniwill_charge_modes_extension);
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
> @@ -1570,25 +1691,35 @@ static int uniwill_battery_init(struct uniwill_data *data)
>   	unsigned int value, threshold;
>   	int ret;
>   
> -	if (!uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY))
> -		return 0;
> +	if (uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_LIMIT)) {
> +		ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, EC_ADDR_CHARGE_CTRL, &value);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
>   
> -	ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, EC_ADDR_CHARGE_CTRL, &value);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> +		/*
> +		 * The charge control threshold might be initialized with 0 by
> +		 * the EC to signal that said threshold is uninitialized. We thus
> +		 * need to replace this value with 100 to signal that we want to
> +		 * take control of battery charging. For the sake of completeness
> +		 * we also set the charging threshold to 100 if the EC-provided
> +		 * value is invalid.
> +		 */
> +		threshold = FIELD_GET(CHARGE_CTRL_MASK, value);
> +		if (threshold == 0 || threshold > 100) {
> +			FIELD_MODIFY(CHARGE_CTRL_MASK, &value, 100);
> +			ret = regmap_write(data->regmap, EC_ADDR_CHARGE_CTRL, value);
> +			if (ret < 0)
> +				return ret;
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		if (!uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_MODES))
> +			return 0;
Would use an "else if (uniwill_device_supports(data, 
UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_MODES))" and put the return 0 at the end of the 
function.
>   
> -	/*
> -	 * The charge control threshold might be initialized with 0 by
> -	 * the EC to signal that said threshold is uninitialized. We thus
> -	 * need to replace this value with 100 to signal that we want to
> -	 * take control of battery charging. For the sake of completeness
> -	 * we also set the charging threshold to 100 if the EC-provided
> -	 * value is invalid.
> -	 */
> -	threshold = FIELD_GET(CHARGE_CTRL_MASK, value);
> -	if (threshold == 0 || threshold > 100) {
> -		FIELD_MODIFY(CHARGE_CTRL_MASK, &value, 100);
> -		ret = regmap_write(data->regmap, EC_ADDR_CHARGE_CTRL, value);
> +		ret = devm_mutex_init(data->dev, &data->charge_type_lock);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		ret = uniwill_read_charge_type(data, &data->last_charge_type);
>   		if (ret < 0)
>   			return ret;
>   	}
> @@ -1609,10 +1740,13 @@ static int uniwill_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action
>   {
>   	struct uniwill_data *data = container_of(nb, struct uniwill_data, nb);
>   	struct uniwill_battery_entry *entry;
> +	int ret;
>   
>   	switch (action) {
>   	case UNIWILL_OSD_BATTERY_ALERT:
> -		if (!uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY))
> +		if (!uniwill_device_supports_any(data,
> +						 UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_LIMIT |
> +						 UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_MODES))
>   			return NOTIFY_DONE;
>   
>   		mutex_lock(&data->battery_lock);
> @@ -1623,10 +1757,24 @@ static int uniwill_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action
>   
>   		return NOTIFY_OK;
>   	case UNIWILL_OSD_DC_ADAPTER_CHANGED:
> -		if (!uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_USB_C_POWER_PRIORITY))
> +		if (!uniwill_device_supports_any(data,
> +						 UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_MODES |
> +						 UNIWILL_FEATURE_USB_C_POWER_PRIORITY))
>   			return NOTIFY_DONE;
>   
> -		return notifier_from_errno(usb_c_power_priority_restore(data));
> +		if (uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_MODES)) {
> +			ret = uniwill_restore_charge_type(data);
> +			if (ret < 0)
> +				return notifier_from_errno(ret);
> +		}
> +
> +		if (uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_USB_C_POWER_PRIORITY)) {
> +			ret = usb_c_power_priority_restore(data);
> +			if (ret < 0)
> +				return notifier_from_errno(ret);
> +		}
> +
> +		return NOTIFY_OK;
>   	case UNIWILL_OSD_FN_LOCK:
>   		if (!uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_FN_LOCK))
>   			return NOTIFY_DONE;
> @@ -1810,7 +1958,7 @@ static int uniwill_suspend_touchpad_toggle(struct uniwill_data *data)
>   
>   static int uniwill_suspend_battery(struct uniwill_data *data)
>   {
> -	if (!uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY))
> +	if (!uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_LIMIT))
>   		return 0;
>   
>   	/*
> @@ -1887,7 +2035,15 @@ static int uniwill_resume_touchpad_toggle(struct uniwill_data *data)
>   
>   static int uniwill_resume_battery(struct uniwill_data *data)
>   {
> -	if (!uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY))
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_MODES)) {
> +		ret = uniwill_restore_charge_type(data);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!uniwill_device_supports(data, UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_LIMIT))
>   		return 0;
>   
>   	return regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, EC_ADDR_CHARGE_CTRL, CHARGE_CTRL_MASK,
> @@ -1970,7 +2126,7 @@ static struct platform_driver uniwill_driver = {
>   
>   static struct uniwill_device_descriptor lapqc71a_lapqc71b_descriptor __initdata = {
>   	.features = UNIWILL_FEATURE_SUPER_KEY |
> -		    UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY |
> +		    UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_LIMIT |
>   		    UNIWILL_FEATURE_CPU_TEMP |
>   		    UNIWILL_FEATURE_GPU_TEMP |
>   		    UNIWILL_FEATURE_PRIMARY_FAN |
> @@ -1981,7 +2137,7 @@ static struct uniwill_device_descriptor lapac71h_descriptor __initdata = {
>   	.features = UNIWILL_FEATURE_FN_LOCK |
>   		    UNIWILL_FEATURE_SUPER_KEY |
>   		    UNIWILL_FEATURE_TOUCHPAD_TOGGLE |
> -		    UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY |
> +		    UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_LIMIT |
>   		    UNIWILL_FEATURE_CPU_TEMP |
>   		    UNIWILL_FEATURE_GPU_TEMP |
>   		    UNIWILL_FEATURE_PRIMARY_FAN |
> @@ -1993,7 +2149,7 @@ static struct uniwill_device_descriptor lapkc71f_descriptor __initdata = {
>   		    UNIWILL_FEATURE_SUPER_KEY |
>   		    UNIWILL_FEATURE_TOUCHPAD_TOGGLE |
>   		    UNIWILL_FEATURE_LIGHTBAR |
> -		    UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY |
> +		    UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_LIMIT |
>   		    UNIWILL_FEATURE_CPU_TEMP |
>   		    UNIWILL_FEATURE_GPU_TEMP |
>   		    UNIWILL_FEATURE_PRIMARY_FAN |
Maybe we should put in some assertion to ensure that 
UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_LIMIT and UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_MODES 
are not set at the same time, or it that being to wary?
> @@ -2578,8 +2734,8 @@ static int __init uniwill_init(void)
>   	}
>   
>   	if (force) {
> -		/* Assume that the device supports all features */
> -		device_descriptor.features = UINT_MAX;
> +		/* Assume that the device supports all features except the charge limit */
> +		device_descriptor.features = UINT_MAX & ~UNIWILL_FEATURE_BATTERY_CHARGE_LIMIT;
>   		pr_warn("Enabling potentially unsupported features\n");
>   	}
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/uniwill/uniwill-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/uniwill/uniwill-wmi.c
> index 31d9c39f14ab..f1b89bc63df6 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/uniwill/uniwill-wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/uniwill/uniwill-wmi.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ int devm_uniwill_wmi_register_notifier(struct device *dev, struct notifier_block
>   static void uniwill_wmi_notify(struct wmi_device *wdev, union acpi_object *obj)
>   {
>   	u32 value;
> +	int ret;
>   
>   	if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER)
>   		return;
> @@ -56,7 +57,9 @@ static void uniwill_wmi_notify(struct wmi_device *wdev, union acpi_object *obj)
>   
>   	dev_dbg(&wdev->dev, "Received WMI event %u\n", value);
>   
> -	blocking_notifier_call_chain(&uniwill_wmi_chain_head, value, NULL);
> +	ret = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&uniwill_wmi_chain_head, value, NULL);
> +	if (notifier_to_errno(ret) < 0)
> +		dev_err(&wdev->dev, "Failed to handle event %u\n", value);
>   }
>   
>   /*
Is this something specific for this patch or just general cleanup that sneaked 
into here?

Best regards,

Werner


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-10 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-06 19:36 [PATCH 0/6] platform/x86: uniwill-laptop: Charging-related improvements Armin Wolf
2026-04-06 19:36 ` [PATCH 1/6] platform/x86: uniwill-laptop: Properly initialize charging threshold Armin Wolf
2026-04-08 22:59   ` Werner Sembach
2026-04-10 17:27     ` Armin Wolf
2026-04-10 20:26       ` Werner Sembach
2026-04-06 19:36 ` [PATCH 2/6] platform/x86: uniwill-laptop: Accept charging threshold of 0 Armin Wolf
2026-04-08 23:01   ` Werner Sembach
2026-04-06 19:36 ` [PATCH 3/6] platform/x86: uniwill-laptop: Fix behavior of "force" module param Armin Wolf
2026-04-08 23:08   ` Werner Sembach
2026-04-10 17:32     ` Armin Wolf
2026-04-10 20:30       ` Werner Sembach
2026-04-10 21:45         ` Armin Wolf
2026-04-06 19:36 ` [PATCH 4/6] platform/x86: uniwill-laptop: Rework FN lock/super key suspend handling Armin Wolf
2026-04-10 15:30   ` Werner Sembach
2026-04-10 17:33     ` Armin Wolf
2026-04-06 19:36 ` [PATCH 5/6] platform/x86: uniwill-laptop: Mark EC_ADDR_OEM_4 as volatile Armin Wolf
2026-04-10 15:35   ` Werner Sembach
2026-04-06 19:36 ` [PATCH 6/6] platform/x86: uniwill-laptop: Add support for battery charge modes Armin Wolf
2026-04-10 16:53   ` Werner Sembach [this message]
2026-04-10 17:53     ` Armin Wolf
2026-04-10 20:24       ` Werner Sembach
2026-04-10 21:47         ` Armin Wolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=520b2905-1120-4375-9333-05f0eb82fe19@tuxedocomputers.com \
    --to=wse@tuxedocomputers.com \
    --cc=W_Armin@gmx.de \
    --cc=hansg@kernel.org \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®