From: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Carsten Emde <cbe@osadl.org>,
Mathias Weber <mathias.weber.mw1@roche.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] sched: Make Priority Inheritance POSIX compliant
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:59:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <520f0cf11001201359h660a3b5auabfd2efc162398d5@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1264021607.4283.1118.camel@laptop>
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 20:58 +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> The current PI implementation violates POSIX scheduling semantics when
>> a thread is deboosted. The following patch series adresses this.
>>
>> Thanks and Kudos go to Mathias Weber and Carsten Emde for analysis,
>> test cases and initial workaround patches.
Oh, that sounds good - would you like to share the test cases for our
rt-test suite?
>
> These look fine to me,
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-20 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-20 20:58 Thomas Gleixner
2010-01-20 20:58 ` [patch 1/3] sched: Extend enqueue_task to allow head queueing Thomas Gleixner
2010-01-22 17:12 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2010-01-20 20:59 ` [patch 2/3] sched: Implement head queueing for sched_rt Thomas Gleixner
2010-01-22 17:12 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2010-01-20 20:59 ` [patch 3/3] sched: Queue a deboosted task to the head of the RT priority queue Thomas Gleixner
2010-01-22 17:13 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Queue a deboosted task to the head of the RT prio queue tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2010-01-20 21:06 ` [patch 0/3] sched: Make Priority Inheritance POSIX compliant Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-20 21:59 ` John Kacur [this message]
2010-01-21 0:52 ` Carsten Emde
2010-01-21 16:16 ` Weber, Mathias
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=520f0cf11001201359h660a3b5auabfd2efc162398d5@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=cbe@osadl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.weber.mw1@roche.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome