From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752752Ab0C2TGa (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:06:30 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]:41467 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751217Ab0C2TG3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:06:29 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=RS6EnVf7026n0O9AGnn+57OAAYelhh5+2327qau4lTrvOXMU4GjzKCV+FVyiM8OwCo jMzuQngythBxFQIaux2HYl2IjMVc2LpsAjnzDrpnop53Evop/G9ZaP/a1KqGknpHVYtl UxgH67q5LiYFkGqqSVFhg7v77MgDOLtXw/nxo= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100329185652.GH5101@nowhere> References: <1269866171-7331-2-git-send-email-jkacur@redhat.com> <1383519680.42441269869622199.JavaMail.root@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <20100329185652.GH5101@nowhere> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:06:27 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2b8637a7cda9825a Message-ID: <520f0cf11003291206i7fae62b7ie7d0e480237aa1f2@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvram: Convert nvram_ioctl to unlocked_ioctl, remove smp_lock.h From: John Kacur To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Ingo Molnar , Alan Cox , Arnd Bergmann , Andrew Morton , Jan Blunck , Matthew Wilcox , Oleg Nesterov , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 09:33:42AM -0400, John Kacur wrote: >> Sorry for the double send, I must have messed-up something with >> git-send-email. The --compose failed on me, and that part of the message was >> lost afaict. >> >> What I wanted to say was, Ingo, in the past you carried nvram fixes, so >> if no-one objects to this change, can you integrate this one? > > > > Note: Just in case, as I don't know if Ingo or Thomas still maintain > a kill-bkl tree, I keep this patch somewhere so that if it's not merged > in a tree in one week or so, I'll queue it up in mine. > In this particular case, I would like to see it get tip testing though. Thanks.