From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756422Ab3IEFBm (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Sep 2013 01:01:42 -0400 Received: from hermes.synopsys.com ([198.182.44.81]:50441 "EHLO hermes.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753553Ab3IEFBl (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Sep 2013 01:01:41 -0400 Message-ID: <52281024.20309@synopsys.com> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 10:31:24 +0530 From: Vineet Gupta User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch,gmane.linux.kernel To: Christoph Lameter CC: Tejun Heo , "akpm@linuxfoundation.org" , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , Steven Rostedt , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [gcv v3 32/35] arc: Replace __get_cpu_var uses References: <20130828193457.140443630@linux.com> <00000140c6781cab-d0df0392-b65b-4213-8be0-1e4a04f67fb2-000000@email.amazonses.com> <00000140caf51d3b-0c5ebca6-f4a7-49b8-94c8-fc8b0bde04b8-000000@email.amazonses.com> <5226E55A.3000705@synopsys.com> <00000140e952bc1f-25743208-6728-4ded-b110-9ded0321f723-000000@email.amazonses.com> In-Reply-To: <00000140e952bc1f-25743208-6728-4ded-b110-9ded0321f723-000000@email.amazonses.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.12.197.111] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/04/2013 07:44 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 4 Sep 2013, Vineet Gupta wrote: > >> Considering other discussions on this thread, shall I drop this from my for-curr >> for this merge window ? I don't see any other arch changes to that effect in >> latest linux-next. > > The required fix of the macros was merged yesterday into upstream. > Yes I do see the macro fix in mainline but no discussions related to missing preemption debug checks after NAK from Peter/Ingo. I'm gonna move this one out of my 3.12 merge window queue to my for-next - so not dropping it (you can rest assured) but it doesn't look merge ready too. OK ? -Vineet