From: Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto@keymile.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
"Brunck, Holger" <Holger.Brunck@keymile.com>,
"Longchamp, Valentin" <Valentin.Longchamp@keymile.com>,
"Bigler, Stefan" <Stefan.Bigler@keymile.com>,
sboyd@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: kernel deadlock
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 16:42:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5231D2CF.5080400@keymile.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130909100853.GJ31370@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Hi Peter,
sorry for the slow response...
On 09/09/2013 12:08 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 10:26:19AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
>> Enabling the SCHED_FEAT(HRTICK, true) bit tends to cause lots of issues
>> on the various hardware I have, tripping the lockdep warnings on various
>> other issues:
>
> Does whatever kernel you guys are running have this commit:
That didn't seem to make a difference (it had already been pointed out
by Stephen Boyd).
In any case, latest patch from John fixes the problem... Hooray! :-)
Thanks again John!
Gerlando
>
> ---
> commit 971ee28cbd1ccd87b3164facd9359a534c1d2892
> Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Date: Fri Jun 28 11:18:53 2013 +0200
>
> sched: Fix HRTICK
>
> David reported that the HRTICK sched feature was borken; which was enough
> motivation for me to finally fix it ;-)
>
> We should not allow hrtimer code to do softirq wakeups while holding scheduler
> locks. The hrtimer code only needs this when we accidentally try to program an
> expired time. We don't much care about those anyway since we have the regular
> tick to fall back to.
>
> Reported-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130628091853.GE29209@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 9b1f2e5..0d8eb45 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -370,13 +370,6 @@ static struct rq *this_rq_lock(void)
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_HRTICK
> /*
> * Use HR-timers to deliver accurate preemption points.
> - *
> - * Its all a bit involved since we cannot program an hrt while holding the
> - * rq->lock. So what we do is store a state in in rq->hrtick_* and ask for a
> - * reschedule event.
> - *
> - * When we get rescheduled we reprogram the hrtick_timer outside of the
> - * rq->lock.
> */
>
> static void hrtick_clear(struct rq *rq)
> @@ -404,6 +397,15 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart hrtick(struct hrtimer *timer)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +
> +static int __hrtick_restart(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> + struct hrtimer *timer = &rq->hrtick_timer;
> + ktime_t time = hrtimer_get_softexpires(timer);
> +
> + return __hrtimer_start_range_ns(timer, time, 0, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED, 0);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * called from hardirq (IPI) context
> */
> @@ -412,7 +414,7 @@ static void __hrtick_start(void *arg)
> struct rq *rq = arg;
>
> raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
> - hrtimer_restart(&rq->hrtick_timer);
> + __hrtick_restart(rq);
> rq->hrtick_csd_pending = 0;
> raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
> }
> @@ -430,7 +432,7 @@ void hrtick_start(struct rq *rq, u64 delay)
> hrtimer_set_expires(timer, time);
>
> if (rq == this_rq()) {
> - hrtimer_restart(timer);
> + __hrtick_restart(rq);
> } else if (!rq->hrtick_csd_pending) {
> __smp_call_function_single(cpu_of(rq), &rq->hrtick_csd, 0);
> rq->hrtick_csd_pending = 1;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-12 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <521F6D06.1040107@keymile.com>
2013-08-29 20:56 ` Falauto, Gerlando
2013-08-29 23:45 ` John Stultz
2013-08-30 23:04 ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-08-30 23:10 ` John Stultz
2013-08-31 0:48 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-08-31 8:11 ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-09-03 14:57 ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-09-03 17:26 ` John Stultz
2013-09-04 8:11 ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-09-09 20:29 ` John Stultz
2013-09-10 7:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-10 16:23 ` John Stultz
2013-09-10 7:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-10 8:59 ` Lin Ming
2013-09-10 16:38 ` John Stultz
2013-09-11 0:37 ` Lin Ming
2013-09-09 10:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-12 14:42 ` Gerlando Falauto [this message]
2003-07-30 20:00 Kernel deadlock Paul Douglas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5231D2CF.5080400@keymile.com \
--to=gerlando.falauto@keymile.com \
--cc=Holger.Brunck@keymile.com \
--cc=Stefan.Bigler@keymile.com \
--cc=Valentin.Longchamp@keymile.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome