From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] crypto: sha256 - Move lib/sha256.c to lib/crypto
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:08:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52363837-5f5f-53ed-d97c-0de47145987b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190818155453.GC1118@sol.localdomain>
Hi,
On 18-08-19 17:54, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 10:28:04AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 17-08-19 07:19, Eric Biggers wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:16:08PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/sha256.h b/include/crypto/sha256.h
>>>> similarity index 100%
>>>> rename from include/linux/sha256.h
>>>> rename to include/crypto/sha256.h
>>>
>>> <crypto/sha.h> already has the declarations for both SHA-1 and SHA-2, including
>>> SHA-256. So I'm not sure a separate sha256.h is appropriate. How about putting
>>> these declarations in <crypto/sha.h>?
>>
>> The problems with that is that the sha256_init, etc. names are quite generic
>> and they have not been reserved before, so a lot of the crypto hw-accel
>> drivers use them, for private file-local (static) code, e.g.:
>>
>> [hans@shalem linux]$ ack -l sha256_init
>> include/crypto/sha256.h
>> drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c
>> drivers/crypto/ccp/ccp-ops.c
>> drivers/crypto/nx/nx-sha256.c
>> drivers/crypto/ux500/hash/hash_core.c
>> drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c
>> drivers/crypto/chelsio/chcr_algo.h
>> drivers/crypto/stm32/stm32-hash.c
>> drivers/crypto/omap-sham.c
>> drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.c
>> drivers/crypto/n2_core.c
>> drivers/crypto/atmel-aes.c
>> drivers/crypto/axis/artpec6_crypto.c
>> drivers/crypto/mediatek/mtk-sha.c
>> drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_algs.c
>> drivers/crypto/img-hash.c
>> drivers/crypto/ccree/cc_hash.c
>> lib/crypto/sha256.c
>> arch/powerpc/crypto/sha256-spe-glue.c
>> arch/mips/cavium-octeon/crypto/octeon-sha256.c
>> arch/x86/purgatory/purgatory.c
>> arch/s390/crypto/sha256_s390.c
>> arch/s390/purgatory/purgatory.c
>>
>> (in case you do not know ack is a smarter grep, which skips .o files, etc.)
>
> You need to match at word boundaries to avoid matching on ${foo}_sha256_init().
> So it's actually a somewhat shorter list:
>
> $ git grep -l -E '\<sha(224|256)_(init|update|final)\>'
> arch/arm/crypto/sha256_glue.c
> arch/arm/crypto/sha256_neon_glue.c
> arch/arm64/crypto/sha256-glue.c
> arch/s390/crypto/sha256_s390.c
> arch/s390/purgatory/purgatory.c
> arch/x86/crypto/sha256_ssse3_glue.c
> arch/x86/purgatory/purgatory.c
> crypto/sha256_generic.c
> drivers/crypto/ccree/cc_hash.c
> drivers/crypto/chelsio/chcr_algo.h
> drivers/crypto/n2_core.c
> include/linux/sha256.h
> lib/sha256.c
>
> 5 of these are already edited by this patchset, so that leaves only 8 files.
Good point.
>> All these do include crypto/sha.h and putting the stuff which is in what
>> was linux/sha256.h into crypto/sha.h leads to name collisions which causes
>> more churn then I would like this series to cause.
>>
>> I guess we could do a cleanup afterwards, with one patch per file above
>> to fix the name collision issue, and then merge the 2 headers. I do not
>> want to do that for this series, as I want to keep this series as KISS
>> as possible since it is messing with somewhat sensitive stuff.
>>
>> And TBH I even wonder if a follow-up series is worth the churn...
>>
>
> I think it should be done; the same was done when introducing the AES library.
> But I'm okay with it being done later, if you want to keep this patchset
> shorter.
I would prefer to do this later, so that we can focus on the basis
of merging the 2 implementations now.
I'm willing to commit to doing the cleanup once the base series has been merged.
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-18 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-16 21:16 [PATCH 0/6] crypto: sha256 - Merge 2 separate C implementations into 1, put into separate library Hans de Goede
2019-08-16 21:16 ` [PATCH 1/6] crypto: sha256 - Fix some coding style issues Hans de Goede
2019-08-16 21:16 ` [PATCH 2/6] crypto: sha256_generic " Hans de Goede
2019-08-16 21:16 ` [PATCH 3/6] crypto: sha256 - Move lib/sha256.c to lib/crypto Hans de Goede
2019-08-17 5:19 ` Eric Biggers
2019-08-17 8:28 ` Hans de Goede
2019-08-18 15:54 ` Eric Biggers
2019-08-18 16:08 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2019-08-16 21:16 ` [PATCH 4/6] crypto: sha256 - Use get_unaligned_be32 to get input, memzero_explicit Hans de Goede
2019-08-17 5:37 ` Eric Biggers
2019-08-16 21:16 ` [PATCH 5/6] crypto: sha256 - Make lib/crypto/sha256.c suitable for generic use Hans de Goede
2019-08-16 21:16 ` [PATCH 6/6] crypto: sha256_generic - Use sha256_transform from generic sha256 lib Hans de Goede
2019-08-17 5:13 ` Eric Biggers
2019-08-17 5:35 ` Eric Biggers
2019-08-17 12:18 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52363837-5f5f-53ed-d97c-0de47145987b@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®