From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754946Ab3I3MSQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:18:16 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33160 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754011Ab3I3MSN (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:18:13 -0400 Message-ID: <52496BFD.4030809@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:18:05 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130923 Thunderbird/17.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Borislav Petkov CC: Eduardo Habkost , LKML , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Gleb Natapov , Andre Przywara , Joerg Roedel , X86 ML , KVM , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, libvir-list@redhat.com, Jiri Denemark , Igor Mammedov Subject: Re: qemu, numa: non-contiguous cpusets References: <20130929151044.GB5426@pd.tnic> <52493EC6.4020403@redhat.com> <20130930094936.GA16383@pd.tnic> In-Reply-To: <20130930094936.GA16383@pd.tnic> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Il 30/09/2013 11:49, Borislav Petkov ha scritto: > Yeah: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-09/msg02833.html > > Although I don't see from it how the syntax for -cpus will look like > from that QAPI magic except that it is an > > + '*cpus': ['uint16'], It's "-numa node,cpus=0-1,cpus=4-5". Paolo