On 10/20/2013 10:34 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote: > Greetings, > > I got the below dmesg and the first bad commit is > > commit 3ab098df35f8b98b6553edc2e40234af512ba877 > Author: Jason Wang > Date: Tue Oct 15 11:18:58 2013 +0800 > > virtio-net: don't respond to cpu hotplug notifier if we're not ready > > We're trying to re-configure the affinity unconditionally in cpu hotplug > callback. This may lead the issue during resuming from s3/s4 since > > - virt queues haven't been allocated at that time. > - it's unnecessary since thaw method will re-configure the affinity. > > Fix this issue by checking the config_enable and do nothing is we're not ready. > > The bug were introduced by commit 8de4b2f3ae90c8fc0f17eeaab87d5a951b66ee17 > (virtio-net: reset virtqueue affinity when doing cpu hotplug). > > Cc: Rusty Russell > Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin > Cc: Wanlong Gao > Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > Reviewed-by: Wanlong Gao > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller > > [ 622.944441] CPU0 attaching NULL sched-domain. > [ 622.944446] CPU1 attaching NULL sched-domain. > [ 622.944485] CPU0 attaching NULL sched-domain. > [ 622.950795] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/mutex.c:616 > [ 622.950796] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 10, name: migration/1 > [ 622.950796] no locks held by migration/1/10. > [ 622.950798] CPU: 1 PID: 10 Comm: migration/1 Not tainted 3.12.0-rc5-wl-01249-gb91e82d #317 > [ 622.950799] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 > [ 622.950802] 0000000000000000 ffff88001d42dba0 ffffffff81a32f22 ffff88001bfb9c70 > [ 622.950803] ffff88001d42dbb0 ffffffff810edb02 ffff88001d42dc38 ffffffff81a396ed > [ 622.950805] 0000000000000046 ffff88001d42dbe8 ffffffff810e861d 0000000000000000 > [ 622.950805] Call Trace: > [ 622.950810] [] dump_stack+0x54/0x74 > [ 622.950815] [] __might_sleep+0x112/0x114 > [ 622.950817] [] mutex_lock_nested+0x3c/0x3c6 > [ 622.950818] [] ? up+0x39/0x3e > [ 622.950821] [] ? acpi_os_signal_semaphore+0x21/0x2d > [ 622.950824] [] ? acpi_ut_release_mutex+0x5e/0x62 > [ 622.950828] [] virtnet_cpu_callback+0x33/0x87 > [ 622.950830] [] notifier_call_chain+0x3c/0x5e > [ 622.950832] [] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10 > [ 622.950835] [] __cpu_notify+0x20/0x37 > [ 622.950836] [] cpu_notify+0x13/0x15 > [ 622.950838] [] take_cpu_down+0x27/0x3a > [ 622.950841] [] stop_machine_cpu_stop+0x93/0xf1 > [ 622.950842] [] cpu_stopper_thread+0xa0/0x12f > [ 622.950844] [] ? cpu_stopper_thread+0x12f/0x12f > [ 622.950847] [] ? lock_release_holdtime.part.7+0xa3/0xa8 > [ 622.950848] [] ? cpu_stop_should_run+0x3f/0x47 > [ 622.950850] [] smpboot_thread_fn+0x1c5/0x1e3 > [ 622.950852] [] ? lg_global_unlock+0x67/0x67 > [ 622.950854] [] kthread+0xd8/0xe0 > [ 622.950857] [] ? wait_for_common+0x12f/0x164 > [ 622.950859] [] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x124/0x124 > [ 622.950861] [] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 > [ 622.950862] [] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x124/0x124 > [ 622.950876] smpboot: CPU 1 is now offline > [ 623.194556] SMP alternatives: lockdep: fixing up alternatives > [ 623.194559] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 1 APIC 0x1 Thanks for the testing Fengguang, could you please try the attached patch to see if it works?