From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: "Amir G." <amir73il@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>,
Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sandeen@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/30] Ext4 snapshots
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:51:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52699.1307746288@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 09 Jun 2011 13:54:13 +0300." <BANLkTin0RKZbDmB1movombH9o4HDpTnvFw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 554 bytes --]
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 13:54:13 +0300, "Amir G." said:
> Why do you keep saying 'backup only'?
> There is a huge difference between having long lived snapshots,
> like CTERA products have, and temporary snapshot for backup
> purpose (for which LVM is adequate).
I must have blinked somewhere - I'm not convinced LVM is even "adequate" for
backup purposes. In particular, how does an LVM-level snapshot deal with the
"metadata in memory" problem (basically the exact same problem as running fsck
on a disk partition that is already mounted)?
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-10 22:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1307459283-22130-1-git-send-email-amir73il@users.sourceforge.net>
2011-06-07 15:56 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-06-07 16:31 ` Amir G.
2011-06-08 10:09 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-06-08 14:04 ` Amir G.
2011-06-08 14:41 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-06-08 15:01 ` Amir G.
2011-06-08 15:22 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-06-08 15:33 ` Amir G.
2011-06-08 15:38 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-06-08 15:59 ` Amir G.
2011-06-08 16:19 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-06-09 1:59 ` Yongqiang Yang
2011-06-09 3:18 ` Amir G.
2011-06-09 3:51 ` Yongqiang Yang
2011-06-09 6:50 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-06-09 7:57 ` Amir G.
2011-06-09 8:13 ` david
2011-06-09 10:06 ` Amir G.
2011-06-09 10:17 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-06-09 8:46 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-06-09 10:54 ` Amir G.
2011-06-09 12:59 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-06-10 7:06 ` Amir G.
2011-06-10 9:00 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-06-10 12:02 ` Amir G.
2011-06-10 22:51 ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
2011-06-11 1:09 ` Amir G.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52699.1307746288@turing-police.cc.vt.edu \
--to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=amir73il@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®