From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <vineetg76@gmail.com>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: use ASM_NL instead of ';' for assembler new line character in the macro
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:53:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <526FA1B7.4090808@asianux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24899.1383043169@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
On 10/29/2013 06:39 PM, David Howells wrote:
> Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com> wrote:
>
>>> > > And you also need to fix kernel/modsign_certificate.S as part of same patchset as
>>> > > that is where the problem started in first place.
>>> > >
>> >
>> > Hmm... can that be another patch?
>> >
>> > For "kernel/modsign_certificate.S", I recommend to expand the macro
>> > which will shrink code line, either need not include additional header
>> > file, I feel that will be simpler for both code reader and writers.
> I recommend leaving that file alone. That gets moved to a .S file in patches
> queued in the security tree.
Excuse me, I am not quite familiar with our version merging, I guess
your meaning is "this file will be removed, and the related contents
will be in another .S file, so we need not fix it within this file".
If what I guess is correct, I support your recommendation (and if what I
guess is incorrect, please let me know, thanks). :-)
BTW: I still use next-20130927 tree for it, and another next-tree branch
which is next-20131025 do not have this file.
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-29 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-28 10:30 Chen Gang
2013-10-28 11:18 ` Max Filippov
2013-10-29 7:57 ` Chen Gang
2013-10-29 8:34 ` Max Filippov
2013-10-29 8:47 ` Chen Gang
2013-10-28 13:45 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-10-29 1:04 ` Chen Gang
2013-10-29 1:39 ` Chen Gang
2013-10-29 1:51 ` [PATCH v2] " Chen Gang
2013-10-29 5:55 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-10-29 6:07 ` Chen Gang
2013-11-01 5:45 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-11-21 9:58 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-11-21 10:52 ` Chen Gang
2014-01-03 12:38 ` Michal Marek
2014-01-06 5:36 ` Vineet Gupta
2014-01-06 9:26 ` Michal Marek
2014-01-09 6:41 ` Vineet Gupta
2014-01-10 15:48 ` Chen Gang
2014-01-12 1:59 ` [PATCH v3] " Chen Gang
2014-01-18 9:44 ` Chen Gang
2014-01-21 4:55 ` Vineet Gupta
2014-01-25 11:07 ` Chen Gang
2014-01-27 21:57 ` Michal Marek
2014-01-30 5:41 ` Chen Gang
2013-10-29 10:39 ` [PATCH] " David Howells
2013-10-29 11:53 ` Chen Gang [this message]
2013-10-29 13:59 ` David Howells
2013-10-30 0:57 ` Chen Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=526FA1B7.4090808@asianux.com \
--to=gang.chen@asianux.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vineetg76@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome