From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761870AbXEKNdR (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2007 09:33:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761538AbXEKNdA (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2007 09:33:00 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.174]:41585 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758583AbXEKNc7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2007 09:32:59 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=EmRUIczJhOTkrCDvvBETI9XL2jO3UEgQ+wDddWf8uL9VtKKVvMLRWJCuvcudyB9FzfrBGnJeThnbS2H+g6svhkT5cMcuQv1yRJt0mZljYpQ6Oi306Sbrz3OYfHUs+AJAHbPj5hBy2RqJu8qUNlvBPOC4N/7B1YOywlVa/1ZuI54= Message-ID: <528646bc0705110632p264f7f01g406802e3084fde0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 07:32:58 -0600 From: "Grant Likely" To: "Jean Delvare" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Eliminate references to new_client in i2c documentation Cc: i2c@lm-sensors.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20070511100139.7bf65825@hyperion.delvare> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070510210409.11678.5134.stgit@trillian.secretlab.ca> <20070511100139.7bf65825@hyperion.delvare> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8021f7d11615a99a Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/11/07, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Grant, > > On Thu, 10 May 2007 15:04:16 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > The use of 'new_client' in i2c device allocation has been refered to as > > a 'disease'. Replace all occurances of 'struct i2c_client *new_client' > > in documentation examples with 'struct i2c_client *client'. > > > > Also remove unnecessary zero initializtion of .flags since kzalloc is used. > > > > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely > > Thanks for your contribution, however I made a similar documentation > cleanup 3 weeks ago: > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/i2c/2007-April/001075.html > It's upstream already. Heh, apparently I don't keep my edge bleeding enough g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc. P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. grant.likely@secretlab.ca (403) 399-0195