From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
To: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com>, <hawk@kernel.org>,
<ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] page pool: not return page to alloc cache during pool destruction
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 17:01:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5296508e-5008-b5bb-ac2e-a0a69b720954@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230615013645.7297-1-liangchen.linux@gmail.com>
On 2023/6/15 9:36, Liang Chen wrote:
> When destroying a page pool, the alloc cache and recycle ring are emptied.
> If there are inflight pages, the retry process will periodically check the
> recycle ring for recently returned pages, but not the alloc cache (alloc
> cache is only emptied once). As a result, any pages returned to the alloc
> cache after the page pool destruction will be stuck there and cause the
> retry process to continuously look for inflight pages and report warnings.
It seems there is still page_pool_put[_full]_page() called with
allow_direct being true after page_pool_destroy() is call, which
is not allowed.
Normally the driver will call napi_disable() before
page_pool_destroy() to ensure there is no such page_pool_destroy()
calling with allow_direct being true after page_pool_destroy() is
called.
>
> To safeguard against this situation, any pages returning to the alloc cache
> after pool destruction should be prevented.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/core/page_pool.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c
> index a3e12a61d456..76255313d349 100644
> --- a/net/core/page_pool.c
> +++ b/net/core/page_pool.c
> @@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ __page_pool_put_page(struct page_pool *pool, struct page *page,
> page_pool_dma_sync_for_device(pool, page,
> dma_sync_size);
>
> - if (allow_direct && in_softirq() &&
> + if (allow_direct && in_softirq() && !pool->destroy_cnt &&
The checking seems racy when __page_pool_put_page() and
page_pool_destroy() are called concurently.
> page_pool_recycle_in_cache(page, pool))
> return NULL;
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-15 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-15 1:36 Liang Chen
2023-06-15 4:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-15 10:49 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2023-06-15 14:00 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-06-16 2:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-16 3:07 ` Liang Chen
2023-06-15 9:01 ` Yunsheng Lin [this message]
2023-06-15 9:06 ` Yunsheng Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5296508e-5008-b5bb-ac2e-a0a69b720954@huawei.com \
--to=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=liangchen.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®